jwhitehorn wrote:I think the question on everybody's mind is.... Will you be paying the Treaty?
Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe
I'm not the the type to play the oppressed, but the victor.
You see, the problem with rebels (for the most part) is all talk talk talk...bash bash bah...no real action.
Apparently trying to "gather" people to joining their side isn't working to well compared to making people not sign a treaty.
Lets say I was deciding to be this so called "rebel". The idea of attacking peace treaty people is sought of a form of terrorism. Yes, it IS terrorism, if people don't take your side, remove them as an obstacle. After all that is what you do. They don't sign you raid/kill. So what is to prevent someone that DOESN'T care how the supporters on the other side feel; knows about whats been going, and of course, love taking down people to show how inferior they truly are in the grand scheme of things. Wouldn't it show that the this peace treaty doesn't protect them like it says it should? How bad would it be to show your supporters that your treaty doesn't ACTUALLY protect them others outside of the treaty?
If I like the game enough, Shining Force members will be glad to come here and take you down a peg...permanently if its needed (I do love a good purging. Your call "Chief". Like I said, I took people like you down before when I joined games in late, the first mistake is thinking I will be the typical player (in this case rebel) with empty promises, you shall soon learn that is not the case. I actually enjoyed the idea of "Peace Treaty" but, only if it was a peace treaty, and your whole tribes weren't *looks for a none offensive words*...Hmmm ah yes "uncaring, uncivilized, and over all *****" about your treaty.
Yeah yeah, people will die, I may die a few times, and you try your try hard trolling showing picks of such things, but I noticed a lot of these were tribe made (yeah I know some were, I cannot be fooled), you are gone for awhile come back and look all of a sudden some new hit houses, no one that claimed these houses. You see your FEAR tactic will not work on I.
Hell I may not even bring my members into this, and use what is here the people already here as my new recruits, the rebels who actually WANT to do something. Like I said if you lose power chaos runs rapid, but not if a superior group maintains control once you are gone. But then again, a game is all about freedom, that is why there were pilgrims, I think its the players fate to decide what they want for them.
So here is an offer, back off or else, it is your call "Chief", I personally am sick of all this rebel talk and nothing getting done by the rebels. The issue is they HAVE NO LEADERSHIP, just a bunch of people pissed of that won't organize well enough. Yeah I read about the "siege" and I can at least give them credit for holding off a siege, but who is the LEADER keeping them organized? That is what I am curious about.
