MaoZeDong wrote:On that note, why would you need to even hint at being girl in the first place?
Because it is really irritating when being referred to as Sir all the time. If people would just stop assuming every damn gamer is a guy and get "upset" when they're not there would be no issues.
Upset?
Yes, it's my collective word for all the ***** and whining, or even belittling and name-calling, some male players resort to when they find out there's females playing "their" game. ...and sometimes it doesn't matter what gender you have if you don't play the game like they do. You'll be belittled and called names anyway (played Uncharted 2 multiplayer for a trophy. Was called 'waste of space' and later '****' in private messages for trying to figure out what to do).
Reminder to self: Patience is a virtue. If Apple blocks Java on Mac: delete
Wow. This thread must be the most derailed thread ever. Only kept alive because a dev is ranting on it.. Im not sure what the ideal state of Jorb would look like. How should it be organized? You want a proper kingdom? Oligarchy? Enlightened absulotism? Where would your role be in this, Jorb?
Somebody once wrote, "Hell is the impossibility of reason." That's what this place feels like. Hell
Wournos wrote:Yes, it's my collective word for all the ***** and whining, or even belittling and name-calling, some male players resort to when they find out there's females playing "their" game.
I've literally only ever seen people like this here and you should read it because it's possibly the most ***** hilarious ***** I've ever seen. There's Tom Cruise tier stupid, there's authoritarian tier stupid, then there's this. This is the prized gem in the crown of "Jesus Christ, what the hell am I hearing?!
TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
Claeyt wrote:Serfdom may have not existed in Sweden but the similar Kronohemman existed well into the 19th century.
I am afraid that your cursory wikipedia session leads you far astray on the matter, though I commend you for trying. The legal form you speak of is simply a heritable right to lease, farm and live on otherwise Royal lands. It is a privilege, not an imposition, and tenant farming != serfdom. To the great surprise of no one, Nordisk Familjebok has an article.
Actually, Kronohemman isn't on wikipedia to my knowledge. I knew about it from having studied a little about economic models of Europe way back when. We were talking about the 19th century mostly so I didn't include the uniformity laws of the old Swedish empire or Late Renaissance Europe. Tenant farming and the inability to buy and sell land were the more important aspects of this system that you should have taken away from it ...But yes, Sweden got rid of serfdom sooner than most. It existed there tho.
jorb wrote:(Though it deserves to be mentioned that feudalism does have an undeservedly bad reputation. Serfs kept some 3/4:s of their earnings, which is obviously quite the leap up from the inverse proportion that my overlords allow me to keep.)
So now you're arguing that we should go back to serfdom.
You might as well argue that American slaves ate better and were in better physical shape under slavery.
They also still had royal taxes on any goods sold and labor done. An American farmer today isn't taxed on his crop. He's taxed on the income he gets from selling that crop, unless he's incorporated which means he'll pay less but have no Social Security. Most farmers split the income generated from the farm to all the members of their family so that they lower their taxes. My guess is that it works the same in Sweden, the crop isn't taxed, rather the income from it is.
If you were to take 25% of an American farmer's crop from him, it would be a hell of a lot more than 25% of his income. The same applies to Serfdom and Tenant farming. You're not taking 25% of the serf's income, you're taking 25% off the goods produced, and maybe all of his income, leaving the other 75% for food, goods required for the farm, and next years crop.
jorb wrote:
Claeyt wrote:I'm not even going to address the fallacy of an argument about going back to the Gold Standard. There's a reason we left it, and it involved the controlled wealth of the world resting in the hands of the few.
I can only strike my bestest and most Buddha-like smile at this.
You do realize that you're in the company of people like Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Fringe Libertarians, and Born-again Survivalists here, right Jorb?
jorb wrote:Your country is run by Megabanks, your middle class is melting away into poverty, and wealth inequality has never been more skewed in the entire -- short -- history of your nation.
All true. Reaganomics, nearly continuous war, free trade not tied to labor regulations or point-of-sale taxes, and the non-federally standardized state controlled labor laws have led to our loss of 1/2 our middle class in the last 30 years.
Hey, we've been around for over 200 years. We're not quite the new kids on the block anymore are we?
jorb wrote:Explain to me slowly why you want a small moneyed elite entirely dominated by big banks, corporate interests and war profiteers to be in control of the intrinsically worthless paper notes that depreciate to the tune of some 2-5-10-15% per year -- depending on how hard Mad Ben arbitrarily decides to run his bubblejet -- to gin up the economy on more cheap money to blow financial bubbles, play recovery, get Bronco-Bamby re-elected, and keep kicking the inevitable can of Federal bankruptcy further down the road for another year or two? Why -- exactly -- is it a progressive value that Goldman Sachs and the Morgan banks should have their vampire squid tentacles invested in the pockets of all holders of dollar denominated personal wealth?
Jeez, Jorb your showing you're true colors here now aren't you? How much Libertarian nonsense do you listen to?
I, of course, do not want a small moneyed elite to dominate anything. We will control the moneyed elite by ending Reaganomics, by ending banks being able to exist both here and in tax havens, by re-regulating banks and lowering their ability to invest in whatever risky ***** they want, by taxing corporations as foreign companies if they have more than 1/2 their wealth buried overseas, and by ending the moneyed elite's power over our political system with sane election funding laws. Remember that Mitt Romney only needed to pay around 10% on his taxes last year on an un-earned income of millions.
That "worthless paper" isn't depreciating at those interest rates. You have to take into account inflation which currently means it's near 0% (80% of our debt is at this level)-3%-7%-13%. If inflation ever goes higher it'll be even easier to pay off, but harder to sell. Since the Eurozone's problems aren't going anywhere soon, I doubt everybody won't keep shoveling money at the fed.
It's not a progressive value to feed Goldman's Sachs and Morgan Stanley, it's a capitalist value. Progressives have been fighting the investment firms and non-industrial moneyed forces for the last 50 years in this country. Unfortunately the moneyed interests also support parts of the Democratic party, we also fight that.
GH Economic Institutions Seattle WTO Demo NYT 120199 copy.jpg (176.35 KiB) Viewed 4501 times
2011_Wisconsin_Budget_Protests_1_JO.jpg (112.19 KiB) Viewed 4501 times
Wall-Street-1.jpg (37.67 KiB) Viewed 4501 times
I'll repeat the warning I gave my fellow Progressives a few posts back. When you resort to name calling Jorb, you lose the game of ideas. Argue your point, show them something new, change the person's mind, that's how you win this game.
Bronco-Bamby? Is that Obama, . Never heard that one. Is that some sort of Swedish right wing thing?
Ben Bernanke is on his way out, you're going to have to find a new scapegoat. I've never supported him anyways.
jorb wrote:You live in a decrepit empire, increasingly being eaten away from the core by the corrosive forces of Neo-conservative Warmongers, Right Wing Zombie ideologies (Reaganomic Thatcherism just wont die!!!) and Unregulated Capitalism, that maintains power and control over a vast array of tributary vassal states across the seas, in defence of the Rockefeller oil interests and the Petrodollar, by sending unmanned Cherubim of steel and death to execute dissidents from 10 000 feet.
I changed that for you.
jorb wrote:The grand, televised drama of your elections is nothing more than a glitzy circus that your puppet masters put on to keep you lulled in the pleasant illusion that freedom still rings from every mountain top and from coast to shining coast, but fundamentally the house doesn't gamble, as all contestants are chosen and selected in advance, in secret board rooms by gray eminences and committees whom you will never see, much less learn the names of.
Yet you still watch them. No board rooms chose Obama, they all chose Clinton and lost. You should have seen them scrambling after his coat tails back in the summer of 2008.
jorb wrote:Whoever wins, you can be certain that the Bohemian Grove, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg group, and the Council on Foreign Relations are still in session, and that the plundering of the American people through fascist bailouts and corporate rackets will continue unabated, the entire sordid affair financed by currency debasement that would make Diocletian blush, confiscatory taxation and the debt financing logic of a gambling addict.
Wow, just...... Wow.
So let me get this strait: You believe that the Masonic World Conspiracy, the American Oil companies, and a collection of Multi-national executives, Old-moneyed European bankers, the Rockefeller family, and American Defense Companies are taking over the world in co-ordination with each other in some sort of secret Cabal. WOW.
All you've taken are a discordant list of Old-money meetings, Corporate economic summits, and Cold War Defense Organizations and turned them into the Boogie-man. You're living in the past if you think that these organizations have anything to do with where this world is heading economically or socially.
Why weren't Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Warren Buffet, or Carlos Slim on that list. They've all changed the World Economy more than those you listed in the last 10 years.
jorb wrote:Son, freedom and responsible government died in America when Lincoln's armies marched across the Potomac to burn, plunder and rape their way through cotton states and constitutions. Your natural aristocracy -- the legitimate heirs of Washington and Jefferson -- struck its last, gallant blow when Pickett charged at Gettysburg, and the history of the United States since has been the history not of a republic but of an increasingly terrifying corporate empire seeking imperial control and profits over ever greater swathes of the world, trampling nations and peoples underfoot on the long march toward the distant, alluring mirage of Orwellian world government.
So I suppose we should have kept our founding father's greatest sin, Slavery, in place. Is that what you regret most, Jorb, the death of government by the elite. Some of those nations trampled under foot were fascist countries, while Sweden did nothing but sell them steel and hide their gold.
jorb wrote:How many fascist Juntas in South-America has your CIA put into power?How many staged coups to subvert popular dissent in foreign countries? Operations Ajax, PBSUCCESS? Gladio? How many disappeared or executed dissidents? How many killed in "interventions" in small, forgotten necks of the woods that you didn't even bother to learn the names of before you started raining death over? Panama, Guatemala, Colombia, Mexico, Iran, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Korea? How many Banana Wars to keep the world safe for the profits of the United Fruit Company?
Why would you think I would disagree with you on any of this, Jorb? They did it for the Capitalists and John Birch insanity of the Cold Warriors and the Defense Machine. Why would you think that we Progressives haven't been fighting this for the last 60 years? (insert images of Vietnam war Protests, McCarthy Trials, Nicaraguan Contra Trials, El Salvador Congressional Hearings, Oliver North on trial)
jorb wrote:And you have the nerve to speak to me about responsible government, the greatness of your representative democracy, and about how I promote the power of a wealthy few?
No, you just yearn for the days of "The natural order of Throne and Altar", right? How could I possibly think that you want to promote the power of the wealthy few?
As for this "Grand Experiment of American Democracy", I have fought the ideas of some of these same conservative forces you've listed above for half my life. I've defended my belief in Progressive Liberalism to so many Neo-Conservative Reaganites, so many Born-Again Militia-men, and yes, now to a Neo-Royalist Christian Libertarian Swedish Gold Bug.
America is not perfect, not even close, but it is constantly rearranging itself towards the better, and trying to atone for it's sins. We have no tapestries of monarchy or aristocracy, in fact it's frowned upon to even hold those views. We are a nation of builders and doers, who aren't held back by history. Yes this leads to base shiny things being exalted above the old order. Thank god for that. We don't pay our monarchs to represent us, instead we allow democracy to winnow the adept and skilled. Obama is proof that anybody can be president. You can disagree with his policies but you can't disagree with that. Yes, we have too much war. Yes, we have too much poverty. But unlike the crumbling relics of European aristocracy, we have a dynamic democracy that changes weekly. We have many sins to pay for and many evils within us. We also have great goodness and a shining light that some people see as a new hope, a new idea, a new city on a hill.. We are both insulated and yet an incredibly diverse, pluralistic nation of immigrants. We have many problems including those orders of Greed and War that you've cited, and I fight their ideas every step of the way.
As my Great-great-great grandfather died at Gettysburg as a major in the Iron Brigade and you somehow don't support the armies of Lincoln (?), I'll leave you with a few of Lincoln's quotes that helped define and change the face of America, showing both it's love of revolutionary spirit and it's militant belief in the equality of all people.
"Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up, and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better. This is a most valuable - a most sacred right - a right, which we hope and believe, is to liberate the world."
"This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or exercise their revolutionary right to overthrow it."
"Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.
But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate -- we can not consecrate -- we can not hallow -- this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "I leave you, hoping that the lamp of liberty will burn in your bosoms until there shall no longer be a doubt that all men are created free and equal."
Last edited by Claeyt on Fri Apr 26, 2013 11:22 pm, edited 4 times in total.
jorb wrote:(jwhitehorn) you are an ungrateful, spoiled child
As the river rolled over the cliffs, my own laughing joy was drowned out by the roaring deluge of the water. The great cataract of Darwoth's Tears fell over and over endlessly.
Just gonna state my opinion here and then get the hell out of here like as if I not posted sheet.
Clearly, I don't really like the feminists.
So, let's say I'm a anti feminist, aka some girl with black hair that hates feminists and doesn't like being near them or even feeling the presence of them. Reason why is simply because I met too much ******, idiot feminists on many games such as Runescape, Torchlight 2 and some other games I cannot think ontop of my head at the moment. (*****) Their reasons for hating mens are stupid. One of the most retarded was ''Every guy in the world treats girls like ****.''. And not to mention, ''They keep touching my ass.''
Yes, some continents does but not every men. I think bois are adorable n' silly as long as they aren't douchebags. Telling me to go back to kitchen or grabbing a beer for them etc etc won't affect me much.
I lost faith for my own genders by that moment. I got so much more to say but. Just done. Rainbow out. Won't talk to feminists anymore.
About the arse part it tends to get annoying but something to deal with is that they just like to touch asses. If someone just came up and touched my arse I wouldn't really go all dragonborn about it like as if it was my first period. Just simply ask why instead of ***** slapping that dude and walk away with your high heels clacking on dem stones. (idontwearhighheelsitstostereotypicalandtofrickinghardtowalkongawshhowcangirlswalkonthese)
I don't like the girls today simply. Sometimes when I see another girl amongst me being sexually offended I always think ''You deserve it, *****.''. Since this and that girl just came to the chat room for etc and shout out ''hai gais im a guuuuuurl now give me dem attentions plz''
Most annoying of them all is attention ***** wars. Happened to me. I didn't even particate that **** in the first place lmao. So, I played the good old Runescape as usual with the guilds. I don't remember but I was obviously the only damsel on the guild. We played, had a really nice time and grindgrindgrind the **** out of monsters and level up. When one day another damsel got invited to the guild and everything was changed. Guild master wasn't aware of how such uppity ***** she is and was on the beginning.
Clearly what happened is, we just grindgrind items like Iron Ore for armor supply for our newbies in the guild, that little damsel was mining Iron Ore amongst us aswell. Alot of us talked except that she was pretty much quiet and didn't say much. Probably that's why GM didn't knew she would be a idiot not so soon. When just in a second, I started to hate my guts on her. She started to flirt with the boys. And made sure all of the attention was turned to her and not me because well simply alot of guys talked to me. [We talked about cards n' card games. Mostly about Black Jack and Sheep Head. It was one of a true card lover guild indeed. I miss it now that the ***** ruined it all] I'm not angry because that she took dem bois and instead she paralyzed my poor bois into talking about melons. GM wasn't there to stop this bombardment. [Not the fruit. Body part. Silly.] I was confused at first, but when she told me ''I'm sexier and hotter than you. I get so much laids. You *****.'' Then I realized she does this because she thinks the bois love me more than her and wants more, way more attention than I actually have. Tho I don't care much of attention, as long as I have a great time playing and grinding, I'm okay with the area around me.
Alot of names it was. One of the bois was a unlucky victim of her and immedieatly became her online boifriend. They even have cyberspace sammanlag.
I reported the whole **** going on to GM but he didn't seem to care much. So I realized I should take most of it by myself, because I was a Co-Leader of that guild and I could banhammer her from the guild, making her never capable of returning back. But first I wanna go and see her, teach her a little lesson. ''Hello Lucy.'' ''hi kittyjane19 u *****'' ''Oh, don't call me names dear.'' ''dude im like totally older than you and im ***** prettier than you gtfo from my guys they are mine'' ''So obviously you are claiming ***** as if they where your territory?'' ''maybe'' ''Let me tell you something, you are not allowed according to the democracy rule to own anyone or force anyone to sexual intercourse or cyberspace or whatso.'' ''lol this is internet ***** i can do what the ***** i want'' ''Not in my guild.'' ''rofl its not urs'' ''It is going to be mine. When Guild Master retires which won't happen in a while.'' ''***** u'' ''That's all you can come up with?'' ''lol the ***** you want to talk about'' ''About your behavior as if you where a *****.'' ''lol u are *****'' ''A ***** is a woman that particates in many sexual intercourses and pretty much sucks crotches. Lives on the streets as a living sperm dump. Do you think I do that?'' ''yes'' ''False. I don't. There are no ***** houses around my neighbourhood in real life. But I bet you live in New York and there is like ***** of ***** houses you can visit.'' ''lol i live in madrid'' ''Senorita, let's not go off topic and discuss regarding of your behavior.'' ''behavior my ass'' ''Oh don't make me angry, sweetheart.'' ''kk i listen'' ''So, first of all you think that all the guys simply turn their attention to me and think I look prettier then you. Kinda hard to explain but you simply think I have more attention and popularity than you, so you became jealous and wanted to steal the poor bois personalities.'' ''go on'' ''Second, you are the *****.'' ''no u *****'' ''Nope. Remember when you said you get more laids then me?'' ''yes'' ''Do you do it with different guys or with the same?'' ''different lol'' ''Then you are a *****. You particate in sexual activity with different crotches. That is what ***** do.'' ''lol do u believe what i say on internet what if its a lie'' ''Well you say you get more laids then me and all that ****. You sound exactly like a ***** so why not?'' ''rofl ***** u ***** i look sexier than you all the guys fall for me lolol'' ''Say goodbye to the guild. Spoilt brat.'' Banhammaren has spoken.
There are more but srsly this happened a while ago.
This is why I don't really like the girls amongst me today. Actually, I lost faith in them.
Some folks say ''Women earned the intelligence. Men earned strength.''
This is me ''Women earned the retardness syndrome. Men earned strength and intelligence.'' This is not all womens tho, I met a couple that was great. Nice n' smart and playing Torchlight 2 and League of Legends with them was a one of a good time. I bet there are more like this than just the retarded Lucy back in Runescape.
I have not experienced men saying to go back to kitchen and those sexisms. Just only in Minecraft, but boi those where childrens with no life.
This is why I consider men nicer and probs the greatest individual people I have ever met. Not to forget to mention they are adorabru than those stereotype girls with makeup and highheels. (myuniversityisstockpiledwiththoseandtheyaregreatdouchebags.yetgoodguyschoosethemwhilstthegirljustbreaksupwiththeguysomedayslater) When they are upset I just want to hug them and pat dem heads and of course give them lollipops as cheer up.
(horysheetthisisthelongestreplyever) But.
I'm out. No more of this. I have said my thing.
Last edited by RainbowMoostache on Fri Apr 26, 2013 7:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.