malaclypse wrote:If you mean that I have empathy and can be shocked by the ignorance and white-supremacists ideals of others, then yes, I lose.
However, if we're measuring by the millenium in which our views are based, then my 3 beats your 1.
malaclypse wrote:If you mean that I have empathy and can be shocked by the ignorance and white-supremacists ideals of others, then yes, I lose.
However, if we're measuring by the millenium in which our views are based, then my 3 beats your 1.
Ghilliedhu wrote:Christian ideologies disturb everybody with a moral compass and a logically-inclined head on their shoulders.
Professor Gu Zhongmao wrote:These projects are beautiful to scientists, but nightmarish to engineers
Jalpha wrote:Yeeeea, I'm not finding anything here hey. Nothing at all which states the term marriage was used prior to religious marriage. In any case the fact remains that no (notable) civilization in history has ever married any other than a man and a woman. Homosexual unions are a new thing, and should be given a new term. Otherwise we would end up arguing the definition of a word till sunset and I'm not into hair splitting.
jorb wrote:
jorb wrote:Ghilliedhu wrote:Christian ideologies disturb everybody with a moral compass and a logically-inclined head on their shoulders.
You are saying that you are a Christian now?
Ghilliedhu wrote:I truly hope you are trolling because with every post in this thread you are losing more and more respect from this community
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests