Where one Falls, Another Rises

[Marlucia]

More divisons! The fragmented leadership of the Rebellion is more bedazzling in the light of defeat. So many faces with so little in common other than a shared enemy. I wonder how much longer it'll be until the rebels begin to rebel against themselves.

So who else is a rebel leader? I wasn't aware the leadership was so fragmented.

[jwhitehorn]

"leadership" is a loosely defined term in the Rebllion. Below is video footage of one of their recent meetings in their famed "seekret" IRC channels.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kN3YfT-hIwU

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe

[Jalpha]

That misconception stems from the fact that there are numerous individuals and individual groups refusing to pay the treaty. The rebel label is one the tribe uses broadly to identify those players. As a result many players with different ideals have accepted that label. It's only considered fragmented leadership by those too small minded to perceive that the rebel label is an overly generalized term.

[Ornery]

That misconception stems from the fact that there are numerous individuals and individual groups refusing to pay the treaty. The rebel label is one the tribe uses broadly to identify those players. As a result many players with different ideals have accepted that label. It's only considered fragmented leadership by those too small minded to perceive that the rebel label is an overly generalized term.

Well-put

[Gallient]

That misconception stems from the fact that there are numerous individuals and individual groups refusing to pay the treaty. The rebel label is one the tribe uses broadly to identify those players. As a result many players with different ideals have accepted that label. It's only considered fragmented leadership by those too small minded to perceive that the rebel label is an overly generalized term.

You imply that individuals are making this generalization rather than simply using "rebel" to define the GH-led effort alone. Both factions have routinely used rebel to define said group. If someone wants to go around and call themselves a rebel they can't be expected not to be associated with GH, just like if someone runs around the forums calling themselves a Tribal member or Indian... You don't filter your descriptors in-case there is another Tribe out there do you?

[colesie]

That misconception stems from the fact that there are numerous individuals and individual groups refusing to pay the treaty. The rebel label is one the tribe uses broadly to identify those players. As a result many players with different ideals have accepted that label. It's only considered fragmented leadership by those too small minded to perceive that the rebel label is an overly generalized term.

You imply that individuals are making this generalization rather than simply using "rebel" to define the GH-led effort alone. Both factions have routinely used rebel to define said group. If someone wants to go around and call themselves a rebel they can't be expected not to be associated with GH, just like if someone runs around the forums calling themselves a Tribal member or Indian... You don't filter your descriptors in-case there is another Tribe out there do you?

I've been a member of the Squirrel Eating Pizza Tribe for months.

Jordan Coles
Squirrel Eating Pizza Tribe

[thl111]

Don't you guys have election or something? Self proclaimed leadership like this is always the cause for internal conflicts.

[Gallient]

I've been a member of the Squirrel Eating Pizza Tribe for months.

Jordan Coles
Squirrel Eating Pizza Tribe

[Jalpha]

You imply that individuals are making this generalization rather than simply using "rebel" to define the GH-led effort alone. Both factions have routinely used rebel to define said group. If someone wants to go around and call themselves a rebel they can't be expected not to be associated with GH, just like if someone runs around the forums calling themselves a Tribal member or Indian... You don't filter your descriptors in-case there is another Tribe out there do you?

The tribe and others have routinely used the term rebel to describe players not part of the GH group. What was your point again?

[Gallient]

You imply that individuals are making this generalization rather than simply using "rebel" to define the GH-led effort alone. Both factions have routinely used rebel to define said group. If someone wants to go around and call themselves a rebel they can't be expected not to be associated with GH, just like if someone runs around the forums calling themselves a Tribal member or Indian... You don't filter your descriptors in-case there is another Tribe out there do you?

The tribe and others have routinely used the term rebel to describe players not part of the GH group. What was your point again?

Proof? Some random calling himself a Rebel but then saying he has nothing to do with GH doesn't mean anything, as it has nothing to do with others making any sort of generalization.