T0ne wrote:See, your setting the line differently relative to your affiliations. Yes staxjaxs post is very very uncalled for and it looks like he got banned for it. So be it, but your buddies post is set in the same tone and brings this conversation in the very same direction albeit in a much less direct and brutish manner. Apply the same standards you just outlined about human garbage to the words and actions that come from your organization and see just how distasteful and disrespectful much of what has been said in this thread is. You raided him, stole/broke his stuff, you posted a thread about it, good, why not leave it at that and move on? Instead you post chat logs which is something a lot of gaming community's frown upon, your groupie comes in here and adds insult to injury with his post...step outside the box for a moment and look at things with a little less bias.
1. Clouddog made the thread and posted logs while cutting out a section that showed him in a different light than he's trying to portray. Yet you would lay all of this at the Chief's feet.
2. I challenge you to find a post made by anyone on the side of the tribe and the treaty that can even be argued to be on the same level of harassment.
3. Chillingbear attacked the behavior, not the individual. There is quite the difference in that. What would you call trying to pretend something is not a big deal just to look good on forums? I wouldn't use "pathetic", but I doubt I would use "honest" or "brave" or anything similar.
4. I hardly think after such blatant bias you should really be using our bias as a basis for your argument.
5. ...Intellectual rhetoric...