Glennfinnan wrote:FutureForJames wrote:He gave very little information. You could even have denied the whole thing
While I may lie ingame I try to keep the lies on the forums to minimum, unlike others [I actually can't recall myself lying on the forums, trolling - yes, occasionally].
So lying is okay only if you troll? XD
Why do you draw the line there? Why is it okay for you to lie when you troll but not in other situations? Furthermore, how can you be sure that most other people do not intend to troll whenever they use lies?
Glennfinnan wrote: FutureForJames wrote:He didn't say anything about your involvement in any PvP
You aren't going to have me dig everything for you, are you? Either read everything or stop arguing with the fraction of info you've got.
viewtopic.php?p=42381#p42381
In the thread you provide, Staxjax implicitely states that you have killed chief alts and that you've left scents in the past; however, Staxjax is known to troll from time to time so you could have denied it, either directly or indirectly (indirectly like just simply ignoring it). Chief very much has reason to take anything Stax says with a big grain of salt.
Glennfinnan wrote: FutureForJames wrote:You could have and can still very much live in the shadows in the sense that you don't disclose what you did and what you didn't do. It is known that you were in Gallows Hill and that you are against Chief, but more than that you do not have to disclose unless you choose to, but you do choose to and you don't seem to see anything problematic with it.
This one may be actually partially right, however disclosing myself [to the little extent I do it] only proves the Chief's lies, which is all I'm aiming for.
Which is in itself a victory for Chief; he got to you and compelled you to get out and start trying to disprove Chief's lies using information about yourself. For instance the "not using any bugs" lie is already proven by the town bell incident, there was not any need for you provide screenshots from attempts to block wall holes using alts: yet you chose too, which brings me back to the point about wanting reckognition. I'll give you a similar advice to the one you gave to me: do not reveal unnecessary information unless it has been proven that the point cannot come across in any other way; it isn't enough to just consider a fraction of all possibilities.