Conjecture regarding governance

Forum for In-Game politics, relations and matters of justice.

Re: Conjecture regarding governance

Postby Procne » Tue Jan 29, 2013 8:44 pm

darnokpl wrote:
Procne wrote:
I didn't say it's not. But I still don't like killing people for giggles. And the thread asked for better system, so I said what I would like more than what we have now


Better system hmmm... I like last idea of GH to gather resources from volunteers, but bad thing in their idea is that those resources are gathered to support single faction!!!
People that will support GH will just feed fighters for next tyrant of plymouth imho. Yes I know that GH said many times they were not care about domination, but after what chief show us all, how domination, can be "FUN" for strongest faction I fear that GH members hunger for praise and worship may change their future behavior.


Hence my first post. Potential tyrants are always most eager to fight for power. And that's how the world rolls
Image
Procne
 
Posts: 3696
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:34 pm

Re: Conjecture regarding governance

Postby fox » Tue Jan 29, 2013 8:47 pm

staxjax wrote:And what if Mushi or other people that have nice bases attack you...MM tribe failed 2 raids already since defense update so how do you think that they will be able to uphold their end of the agreement going forward?

I wanna to see "Staxjax Most Wanted List", please show it to us :mrgreen:
Image
Image Unaussprechlichen Kulten
Image De Furtivis Literarum Notis by Giovanni Battista della Porta
fox
 
Posts: 345
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:20 am

Re: Conjecture regarding governance

Postby jwhitehorn » Tue Jan 29, 2013 8:48 pm

Procne wrote:A better system? Similar to chief's but with differences:
- MM doesn't raid people unwilling to pay
- MM doesn't spawn sock puppets on forum and doesn't try to turn their griefing into acts of "justice"
- MM doesn't try to force monopoly on stalls but allows free market
- MM doesn't kill newbies for giggles

But hey, that's what they were fighting for!


To keep this thread on point Mr. Procne brings up many interesting topics for being a Wanted Criminal.


- MM doesn't raid people unwilling to pay
- Those who take the luxuries from their government (safety, lotterys, clear roads, enforced system of laws) and yet refuse to pay that governement are subject to have their property seized (raided). I'm pretty sure this applies in every form of modern government now.

- MM doesn't spawn sock puppets on forum and doesn't try to turn their griefing into acts of "justice"
- To my knowledge there have been (2) sockpuppets. The rest have been real people with real accounts who get labled as such for using some common sense.

- MM doesn't try to force monopoly on stalls but allows free market
- And are you allowed to transport high end technology out of your country to developing nations? How about blueprints to uranium production? Can you obtain financing on property for more than what it appraises for? Can you even "gift" a large sum of material wealth without paying a gift tax? Unfortunately, once again, every form of government imposes some form of regulation on free trade and open markets. The world would be Chaos if any person could transfer and launder any amount of goods through a stall to Raiders and Evil-Doers so our regulation of this mechanic is necessary for Justice.

- MM doesn't kill newbies for giggles
- While MM may giggle DURING the killing. I can assure you that the killing itself occurs for incidents of justice. Do not get that confused. We have never killed a Treaty Payer. And anybody not paying the treaty is essentially stealing the luxuries the Treaty provides (safety on the server) from those who are funding it. Not all forms of larceny leave a scent.

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe
Last edited by jwhitehorn on Tue Jan 29, 2013 8:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Admin for Salem Wiki • Make suggestions or complaints in the Wiki Suggestion thread
User avatar
jwhitehorn
 
Posts: 5307
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: Conjecture regarding governance

Postby L33LEE » Tue Jan 29, 2013 8:49 pm

Whats the saying ?

Dont hate the player, hate the game.

Catch my drift ?
Retribution ~ Death comes to those who wait.

Wishy for Mod - http://forum.salemthegame.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=7783
User avatar
L33LEE
 
Posts: 1134
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 3:58 pm

Re: Conjecture regarding governance

Postby staxjax » Tue Jan 29, 2013 8:51 pm

No, they are donating stuff because A)they dont like the midgets and B)they want to be allies/friends with us. The amount of people that support our cause grows larger by the day, and I have been keeping track of all the people that have been contributing.

Go ahead and break out then . I dare you.


Who do you think went and tested out the defenses on your nearby base? So yeah, you might want to take a stroll around that base and collect the evidence.
Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most - Ozzy Osbourne

Confirmed retards: Nimmeth, Claeyt, MycroSparks
User avatar
staxjax
 
Posts: 2845
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:29 am

Re: Conjecture regarding governance

Postby staxjax » Tue Jan 29, 2013 8:51 pm

fox wrote:I wanna to see "Staxjax Most Wanted List", please show it to us :mrgreen:


fox will always be #1 on my list.
Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most - Ozzy Osbourne

Confirmed retards: Nimmeth, Claeyt, MycroSparks
User avatar
staxjax
 
Posts: 2845
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:29 am

Re: Conjecture regarding governance

Postby darnokpl » Tue Jan 29, 2013 8:53 pm

Procne wrote:
Hence my first post. Potential tyrants are always most eager to fight for power. And that's how the world rolls


Maybe we just need people that would not care about power... many mercenaries that would care about glory, silver, fun and pvp?
Mercenaries would be fed by free people from free will and paid from time to time to kill criminal or unite to destroy faction that is trying to dominate any server? ¦]
Yes I know, question is who would stop mercenaries from becoming faction and next tyrant :| that is something I have to think about...
Image
User avatar
darnokpl
 
Posts: 2019
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 12:10 am

Re: Conjecture regarding governance

Postby jwhitehorn » Tue Jan 29, 2013 8:55 pm

staxjax wrote: I have been keeping track of all the people that have been contributing.


So have I. Its unfortunate that you would take so much from those who have so little. Especially when they could have used those resources to either pay the treaty and be safe... OR defend their own base. No matter what you do it seems it always ends with you being the direct result of noob deaths.

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe
Admin for Salem Wiki • Make suggestions or complaints in the Wiki Suggestion thread
User avatar
jwhitehorn
 
Posts: 5307
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: Conjecture regarding governance

Postby staxjax » Tue Jan 29, 2013 8:59 pm

Good for you. You now have a very large list of freshly spawned 5 humour nubs.
Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most - Ozzy Osbourne

Confirmed retards: Nimmeth, Claeyt, MycroSparks
User avatar
staxjax
 
Posts: 2845
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:29 am

Re: Conjecture regarding governance

Postby jwhitehorn » Tue Jan 29, 2013 9:01 pm

staxjax wrote:Good for you. You now have a very large list of freshly spawned 5 humour nubs.


If that were true they wouldn't have all been mem'd from months ago. These were mains.... Mains that had been along awhile. Its going to be heartbreaking when they all lose them.

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe
Admin for Salem Wiki • Make suggestions or complaints in the Wiki Suggestion thread
User avatar
jwhitehorn
 
Posts: 5307
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:07 pm

PreviousNext

Return to House of Burgesses

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests