Why this late on Plymouth am I still only seeing 3-4 walls?

Forum for off topic and general discussion.

Re: Why this late on Plymouth am I still only seeing 3-4 wal

Postby jwhitehorn » Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:03 pm

Yeah the Ram system seems dumb. The game is extremely balanced right now. The only thing we are seeing is that the player base is not :). When you have one extremely noob faction like GH and then put them against an extremely experienced faction like MM you are definitely going to see inconsistencies. But thats like putting a 6 year old against Kobe Bryant and complaining that Basketball isn't balanced.

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe
Admin for Salem Wiki • Make suggestions or complaints in the Wiki Suggestion thread
User avatar
jwhitehorn
 
Posts: 5307
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: Why this late on Plymouth am I still only seeing 3-4 wal

Postby dageir » Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:16 pm

Hmm.. Well. I think there is more to it. And the tribe should perhaps consider what their next steps would be, since they risk to be playing alone and maybe against some noobs that wander into the Plymouth server by mistake.
Somebody once wrote, "Hell is the impossibility of reason." That's what this place feels like. Hell
User avatar
dageir
 
Posts: 1270
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 2:36 pm

Re: Why this late on Plymouth am I still only seeing 3-4 wal

Postby jwhitehorn » Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:24 pm

dageir wrote:Hmm.. Well. I think there is more to it. And the tribe should perhaps consider what their next steps would be, since they risk to be playing alone and maybe against some noobs that wander into the Plymouth server by mistake.


Yes you bring up a good point. If Kobe Bryant goes to the playground and forgets to bring his ball he must be careful with how badly he beats the 6 year old's in fear of them taking the ball and going home in tears. Do you suggest we begin missing shots on purpose?

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe
Admin for Salem Wiki • Make suggestions or complaints in the Wiki Suggestion thread
User avatar
jwhitehorn
 
Posts: 5307
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: Why this late on Plymouth am I still only seeing 3-4 wal

Postby Kaios » Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:35 pm

dageir wrote:Hmm.. Well. I think there is more to it. And the tribe should perhaps consider what their next steps would be, since they risk to be playing alone and maybe against some noobs that wander into the Plymouth server by mistake.


Your point is valid but I wouldn't bother trying to argue with what is essentially a brick wall.

Example:

jwhitehorn wrote:The game is extremely balanced right now.


No point in trying to reason with someone who says something like this.
Kaios
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:25 am

Re: Why this late on Plymouth am I still only seeing 3-4 wal

Postby jwhitehorn » Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:38 pm

Kaios wrote:
No point in trying to reason with someone who says something like this.


I would love to hear why a game of 16,000 registered users cannot siege a base made by a group of less than 50 committed braves. Even if you subtract the 100 treaty payers from the equation that is still 15,900 players who spend their time whining about how "imbalanced" defense is yet they are powerless in destroying a base made by a group 5% their numbers. If anything the more you complain while our base stands the more you prove that defenses need to be nerfed. Clearly they are OP if our base still stands.

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe
Admin for Salem Wiki • Make suggestions or complaints in the Wiki Suggestion thread
User avatar
jwhitehorn
 
Posts: 5307
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: Why this late on Plymouth am I still only seeing 3-4 wal

Postby Kaios » Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:41 pm

jwhitehorn wrote:Image
Kaios
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:25 am

Re: Why this late on Plymouth am I still only seeing 3-4 wal

Postby Shiala » Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:47 pm

16,000 registered users... as if that actually counts for something. :lol:

Hmm let's see here, I'm seeing 120 on Plymouth at the moment. Yep, definitely a huge force that should be taking you down, especially once you subtract those paying the treaty.
User avatar
Shiala
 
Posts: 194
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 12:18 am

Re: Why this late on Plymouth am I still only seeing 3-4 wal

Postby alloin » Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:47 pm

Kaios wrote:
jwhitehorn wrote:Image

Even more walls will bring more QQ if you can't go through 1 wall ;-)
jorb wrote:all I see is misplaced machismo and a lot of very cheap talk. ^^

Darwat confirmed scrub!
User avatar
alloin
Customer
 
Posts: 3031
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:33 am

Re: Why this late on Plymouth am I still only seeing 3-4 wal

Postby jwhitehorn » Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:49 pm

Shiala wrote:16,000 registered users... as if that actually counts for something. :lol:

Hmm let's see here, I'm seeing 120 on Plymouth at the moment. Yep, definitely a huge force that should be taking you down, especially once you subtract those paying the treaty.


So 120 players on plymouth.

Estimated 5% of the players online.

so 2,400 players - 100 treaty players = 2,300 players

2,300 players - 50 braves = 2,250

2,250 players unable to destroy ONE base = Defenses OP.

Even with your numbers D still needs to be nerfed.

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe
Admin for Salem Wiki • Make suggestions or complaints in the Wiki Suggestion thread
User avatar
jwhitehorn
 
Posts: 5307
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: Why this late on Plymouth am I still only seeing 3-4 wal

Postby Kaios » Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:51 pm

I'm actually beginning to wonder if you really believe this garbage you come up with.
Kaios
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:25 am

PreviousNext

Return to City upon a Hill

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests