belgear wrote: there are a couple people who's blinders get thrown on as soon as they see a name
TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
MaxPlanck wrote:
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=20442&start=50
Reviresco wrote:I log into this game and have fun.
Ronch wrote:MaxPlanck wrote:
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=20442&start=50
Thanks again for the link.
You are right...
After reading the entire linked thread, I now have adifferentcorrected perspective on your stance.
: my apologie(s).
GigiBecali wrote:The water idea is nice, I will always support ideas that make the game less tedious
MaxPlanck wrote:I guess you couldn't understand the idea either Taipon.
Change buckets to collect water via the method sifting is currently using, thus the already existing autosift option in custom clients was kept in mind aswell when I suggested this.
That might be what confused some people who probably just thought you would still collect water the same way but somehow make it tedious because you had to wait for the water to be collected to grab more manually.
So, whether the Devs added autobucketing themselves with it or the custom client makers would have added it quickly after anyway it would be a great change.
And so, Wells would be made useful once again, and collecting water in general would be less tedious.
As for the person who suggested Wells be built anywhere at increased costs(Haven&Hearth) thats a decent idea to consider aswell with this change.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests