i hope claeyt is ok

by **saltmummy** » Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:05 pm

Flame wrote:It would not work if i nuke the asia, that is anwering with human bombs.

Asia is attacking people with human bombs now?

by **Flame** » Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:07 pm

Human bombs = Simplification of "terrorist attack"
Asia = simplification of east part of the world

by **Darwoth** » Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:30 pm

Flame wrote:I would actually punch you in the face for several reasons, Darw, but let's try to explaing things in peace.
So calm down.

trust me, you really really wouldn't :lol:

by **Strakknuva225** » Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:56 pm

Attempting to understand Flame's point is like trying to untangle a ball of christmas lights two meters in diameter and attempting to argue with him is like herding a bunch of sheep addled with dementia.

by **Flame** » Mon Jun 13, 2016 9:13 pm

I'll make that simple then.

Coul you stop the "we are the good" game?
That's disrespectful for who is actually dying.

If you don't understand what i mean, feel free to ask.

by **Goldenx** » Mon Jun 13, 2016 9:24 pm

I'm reading all of these comments and what I don't see any difficulties in understanding what Flame means, Flame just develops one argument in to a big chunk of text with all the known examples, but most of it is clear.

by **Flame** » Mon Jun 13, 2016 9:29 pm

They understand me enough, but they want to put me on Clayet level, so don't worry. I already know my english is not That bad.

Even so, there are more important thing than pride or a chara game, so is fine. What i'm doing is defend my family, so this bully posts are harmless.

They can ask me to explain every point they don't understand. I can ask a friend to help me to write it correctly.
(They will never ask explanations, but that's theyr fault then.)

by **Darwoth** » Mon Jun 13, 2016 10:13 pm

has nothing to do with your english, has to do with your moonbat retard argument where it is everyone except the muslim terrorists fault that muslim terrorists are killing unarmed non combatants.

by **Flame** » Mon Jun 13, 2016 10:34 pm

Oh, ok, that's a minor problem then!
This quote should fix the misunderstanding:

both parties are doing *poopy* things

(a word have slightly changed, guess wich one? XD)

You probably won't agree about the Usa responsabilities, but you would agree about the east side responsabilities. Surely you know, now, that a murderer is a murderer also for me.

We both wish to fight a war against an enemy. You see an enemy, i see two.

Anyway, what would you do to win the war with the smaller dead count possible?
(no irony. Well, maybe jus a little, in the explamation point. Don't be upset for a ! ;P)