Judaism wrote:I do not like it when people get treated differently, positively OR negatively in any case. .
says the guy that has used the developers inactivity to skirt the rules for the last three months starting with moving all your **** onto jorbs island which was first owned by myself and then three or four others after jorb nuked my claim on it, and then nuked theirs.
whos faction creates several floating lillypad vaults with no attack point the way i was forced to do so with my own.
in any case if that was marp who deleted the **** then he must of randomly felt like doing it since walling TBCs and TBFs has been legal and standard across the game since day one that TBF claims were implemented, i once had an impromptu donut of my own that was made from lean tos before you could walk through them deleted which saved another two pack of kzerg clowns. i thought it was quite ***** at the time given that it was a far less effective donut than even an unclaimed wall section, however lailiath whined about it and they were nuked, so by the time i saw the problem she had run away and the scents expired before i could retrack.
reasoning i was given is that it was because lean to's were free and the reason that a townbell donut was acceptable is due to the fact it was expensive, and then later made far more expensive for that exact reason. point is donuting has been a frequent topic here for years and the fact it has been discussed at length in every possible manner during that time to discuss what is or is not allowed should make it quite clear that donuting is a valid tactic, as it should be unless one wants to simply hand yet another aspect over to the ***** of zergy trash players.
likewise a double claim/hovel donut as pictured here has always been legal as well in spite of their low cost compared to a townbell because it is easily defeated by simply extending your town claim over it and domaining the claims in the the 24 hour period you have to do so.