Clothes

by **Dallane** » Wed Oct 21, 2015 7:33 pm

Heffernan wrote:
Dallane wrote:If i remember correctly I think I recall a convo with JC talking about wanting us to wash cloths so they don't get destroyed or something along those lines. I think it would be a nice addition along with a good way to remove insanity.

nope, 100% no, we already have enough grind in salem, no need to watch for clothes now or anything that makes it even harder to survive.

It wouldn't make it harder. It would give more depth to the game and give a excellent way for people to recover insanity. This would also be a increase in the economy for soaps. We could also add diseases into this excellent mechanic.

by **dinoxx7xx** » Wed Oct 21, 2015 8:08 pm

soaps shall have use now! :lol:

by **Yes** » Wed Oct 21, 2015 8:43 pm

I think it's

instead of

not even

would probably make the game less appealing

by **Heffernan** » Wed Oct 21, 2015 8:50 pm

Dallane wrote:
Heffernan wrote:
Dallane wrote:If i remember correctly I think I recall a convo with JC talking about wanting us to wash cloths so they don't get destroyed or something along those lines. I think it would be a nice addition along with a good way to remove insanity.

nope, 100% no, we already have enough grind in salem, no need to watch for clothes now or anything that makes it even harder to survive.

It wouldn't make it harder. It would give more depth to the game and give a excellent way for people to recover insanity. This would also be a increase in the economy for soaps. We could also add diseases into this excellent mechanic.

only if you give us no sideeffect if clothings disappearing or anynegative effect of this, only positives.

by **Dallane** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:52 am

Heffernan wrote:only if you give us no sideeffect if clothings disappearing or anynegative effect of this, only positives.

only positive is really boring.

by **Heffernan** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 2:44 am

Dallane wrote:
Heffernan wrote:only if you give us no sideeffect if clothings disappearing or anynegative effect of this, only positives.

only positive is really boring.

but we already have to many negative things, we should concentrate on removing some other then bringing more in.

by **Dallane** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 2:47 am

Heffernan wrote:
Dallane wrote:
Heffernan wrote:only if you give us no sideeffect if clothings disappearing or anynegative effect of this, only positives.

only positive is really boring.

but we already have to many negative things, we should concentrate on removing some other then bringing more in.

With negatives we always have a positive side of things.

by **Heffernan** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 2:49 am

Dallane wrote:
Heffernan wrote:
Dallane wrote:
only positive is really boring.

but we already have to many negative things, we should concentrate on removing some other then bringing more in.

With negatives we always have a positive side of things.

oh yeah i forgot we have a positive side of madness...