The Raid on the Jewel.

[Hose]

Then when did he destroyed us?

i didnt know that you can use "did verb-ed"

[Trismegistus]

It's a bit like being in favor of the Nazis imo.

After much contemplation and analysis, I have decided that comparing Darwoth's two TBF's to the 20th century Nazi Party's political moves to be a bit too far.

[Argentis]

Then when did he destroyed us?

i didnt know that you can use "did verb-ed"

Nice spotting ;p

[dafels]

**** the ***** up simon

[Hose]

**** the ***** up simon

i lub u too dabis)))

[Darwoth]

Calling someone an idiot when you can't differentiate "your" and "you're". Hum okay...
Then again you are rooting for the attacker, which without provocation attacked us. It's a bit like being in favor of the Nazis imo.
On the forums we usually help the newbies (check posts history) whereas Darworth is the one ***** himself every time there is a change.
Then when did he destroyed us? He didn't as of yet. And if he did destroy our town like tomorrow or so we have already demonstrated that we could fight back and thus that wouldn't fit the definition of being destroyed or pwned.
And yet again we are the people who stopped playing months ago so what would Darworth achieve by destroying our town?
Being sure that we wouldn't come back? For my end it was already decided months ago when I decided to stop playing.
Loot? We already gave away most of our stuff anyway so I doubt that it will be worth the time.
And we are *****, perhaps, but not without reasons.
Personally I ***** because I am a honorable person and I cannot stand dishonesty like the kind Darworth employ. Using spies is simply dishonest. Dallane is dishonest for being a spy. TBFing a town without reasons or a proper declaration of war is dishonest. Attacking while people cannot defend is dishonest. Do you see my point of view?
I'm not against being attacked, I'm being against people like Darworth (or at least his internet persona as he may be a great guy in real life) existing.

apparently according to ******* here having not one but two members incessantly piss and moan and talk **** about me directly for over a week is "unprovoked"

apparently towns that have rows of freshly planted trees and fields and 4 active players "quit months ago"

apparently sneaking up to an unattended waste claim nobody tried to defend is a demonstration of "fighting"

apparently ***** over a townmember that tried to help causing said town member to predictably turn against them is "shameful" on the part of me or said townmember.

[Judaism]

Darwoth will never will break that town, with any defending going on. We estimated it on about 50+ hours straight without intervention from a third party and thats with 4 raiders atleast.

He's a little dog, searching for leftovers every day, he waits for months and sometimes he gets a somewhat proper meal by doing so. The dog mainly runs away or hides in a dark corner.

[Hose]

[Darwoth]

Darwoth will never will break that town, with any defending going on. We estimated it on about 50+ hours straight without intervention from a third party and thats with 4 raiders atleast.

He's a little dog, searching for leftovers every day, he waits for months and sometimes he gets a somewhat proper meal by doing so. The dog mainly runs away or hides in a dark corner.

and meanwhile the town i am attacking their town from WAS judaism's primary town,


THE COMEDY NEVER ENDS

[Judaism]

My town was not really good defended. It was completely raidable without actually breaking any (brick)wall under the town bell, since I had boundary objects place outside my walls you could enter the centre without commiting crimes. No idea why you keep bragging about destroying one of my inactive towns.

I don't see it very funny that you lay waste from there, its obvious a good location to lay waste from, but nothing more than you would construct within a couple hours.