Dallane wrote:Yet you show online in kin list.
but the chatting attemp clearly proves "this user is not online"
Dallane wrote:Yet you show online in kin list.
Heffernan wrote:Dallane wrote:Yet you show online in kin list.
but the chatting attemp clearly proves "this user is not online"
HolyLight wrote:Wasnt this an arguement about the in game character and not the user?
TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
Heffernan wrote:but the chatting attemp clearly proves "this user is not online"
loftar wrote:Heffernan wrote:but the chatting attemp clearly proves "this user is not online"
The original point was whether a character could stay online such that it continues to accrue insanity, which what Dallane showed clearly does.
TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
loftar wrote:Heffernan wrote:but the chatting attemp clearly proves "this user is not online"
The original point was whether a character could stay online such that it continues to accrue insanity, which what Dallane showed clearly does.
JohnCarver wrote:anybody who argues to remove a mechanic that allows "yet another" way to summon somebody is really a carebear in disguise trying to save his own hide.
MagicManICT wrote:The bigger question should be... Should a player with a character forced into the world be allowed to log in on any other character while one character is stuck in the world? I say No! The character stuck logged in should be foreced to resolve the situation first!
Dallane wrote:loftar wrote:Heffernan wrote:but the chatting attemp clearly proves "this user is not online"
The original point was whether a character could stay online such that it continues to accrue insanity, which what Dallane showed clearly does.
Even the old god agrees with me.
Lachlaan wrote:The motherbats await a spanking, for the sake of fields.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests