![Trollface ¦]](./images/smilies/troll.gif)
(and that my friends, is why I fail my History)
loleznub wrote:Heffernan wrote:loleznub wrote:So if it's a player driven economy why don't we just rebel against the king like history says is bound to happen?
Keep the tax to the largest towns and with the king gone, it gets rid of a portion of the tax
Only issue would be uniting everyone in the game for some massive event the JC would need to make (Massive line battle prox?)
because JC controls the taxes not the inexistent king![]()
but yeah id like a event where we throw down the kind and vote someone else as king so he dictates like...
HAIL KING DALLANE!
JC is essentially the King. I don't see why he wouldn't let us rebel if we got a large enough group, with consequences of failing: Tax increases, a sieze of all silver in banks, etc
loleznub wrote:Im not saying no taxes, Im saying remove the kings share of 15%, reducing the taxes to 20% for the largest towns (Since without the "king" protecting us, they would be
DarkNacht wrote:We should be able to overthrow the king but it should also remove the safe zone from Prov.
TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
Dallane wrote:Good. Get out cry baby.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests