A warning to those who have "Strong" friends...

[Nektaris]

He's not gonna suicide his main anyway

[Hose]

He seems retarded

[Heffernan]

He's not gonna suicide his main anyway

wont be a suicide if he brekas the wall with either a char pumped to 350 phlegm and some black bile only or uses his main and creates a new char after he looted all the valuables and then got TBCd... surely i bet arcadia has more valuables then a 350bile char takes to make, alone the black/golden tophats, feather hat, all the WSS/spiderSacs/pearls/claws and lots of other stuff...

[Necrobane]

Heffernan looks funny then he is imaginationing himself as proffesional

[Heffernan]

Heffernan looks funny then he is imaginationing himself as proffesional

Necrobane looks funny when hes imaginationing himself as knowing how to spell


(seriously if u cant even spell the english language u have no right to harass anyone)

[Procne]

Heffernan looks funny then he is imaginationing himself as proffesional

Necrobane looks funny when hes imaginationing himself as knowing how to spell


(seriously if u cant even spell the english language u have no right to harass anyone)

Says the guy who can't spell "you" ^^

[Murphy]

chief*

[Cheena]

How are Rustatorium people KKK's mains exactly ?

[Argentis]

As OP asks for me to explain how he is as hypocritical as the top groups:
It's actually very simple, you accuse those groups of hypocrisy, that they attack other people in the name of justice, yet at the same time you do the same when you attack a hermit (probably innocent of any crime except the one you accuse him of). How is it not hypocritical to attack an innocent under the protection of one you think to be a guilty party? It is the same reasoning that makes certain people bomb innocents because those innocents live in the same country as a dictator.
Those hermits probably did not choose to ally themselves with the top groups. It just happened to be that they wanted to survive in a harsh world and that it was the only way. How can you ask of them to fight the top groups without any support and a low bile character?
You would probably have more success if you had tried to rally thoe innocents to your cause rather tham accusing them of a crime they and perhaps no one have ever commited.
That fits my definition of hypocrisy. More to come im on my phone right now.

[Sky_Cardis]

It's actually very simple, you accuse those groups of hypocrisy, that they attack other people in the name of justice, yet at the same time you do the same when you attack a hermit (probably innocent of any crime except the one you accuse him of). How is it not hypocritical to attack an innocent under the protection of one you think to be a guilty party?
Those hermits probably did not choose to ally themselves with the top groups. It just happened to be that they wanted to survive in a harsh world and that it was the only way. How can you ask of them to fight the top groups without any support and a low bile character?
You would probably have more success if you had tried to rally thoe innocents to your cause rather tham accusing them of a crime they and perhaps no one have ever commited.

^
I was discussing this with people just moments before he posted. Same exact dicussion with a few people.
Some people don't support any faction and just stay away from it all.