
I think that is the first time I have seen you swear MagicMan.
belgear wrote::shock:
I think that is the first time I have seen you swear MagicMan.
TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
pistolshrimp wrote:I see IP addresses are a raw spot for ya'll.
DarkNacht wrote:pistolshrimp wrote:I see IP addresses are a raw spot for ya'll.
Its just a dumb suggestion that frequently comes up.
TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
DarkNacht wrote:pistolshrimp wrote:I see IP addresses are a raw spot for ya'll.
Its just a dumb suggestion that frequently comes up.
JohnCarver wrote:anybody who argues to remove a mechanic that allows "yet another" way to summon somebody is really a carebear in disguise trying to save his own hide.
JC wrote:I'm not fully committed to being wrong on that yet.
MagicManICT wrote:It's not a dumb suggestion, but it's like trying to kill termites in your house with explosives.
MagicManICT wrote:Once IP v6 is fully adopted, NAT could/should become history, though I doubt it'll get dropped because it helps add a bit of security and anonymity.
TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
Dallane wrote:MagicManICT wrote:Once IP v6 is fully adopted, NAT could/should become history, though I doubt it'll get dropped because it helps add a bit of security and anonymity.
IPv6 will more then likely never be fully adopted unfortunately. NAT is also not a good security practice at all nor does it keep someone anon.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests