Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Forum for In-Game politics, relations, matters of justice, and other in-game topics.

Re: Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Postby Michael » Fri Oct 31, 2014 11:40 am

Wow, how long is this voting going to go on for!?
Y'all remember back when MM Tribe was a thing?
Michael
 
Posts: 432
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:16 am

Re: Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Postby Kandarim » Fri Oct 31, 2014 12:05 pm

Voting has now been open for about two weeks: characters that existed at the time got a voting ballot in their post.
I have neither the crayons nor the time to explain it to you.
JC wrote:I'm not fully committed to being wrong on that yet.
User avatar
Kandarim
Customer
 
Posts: 5321
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 4:18 pm

Re: Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Postby MarpTarpton » Fri Oct 31, 2014 1:42 pm

The votes are being tallied.
Procne wrote: Devs have again proven that they dont give a crap about untalented and lazy players.
User avatar
MarpTarpton
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2014 6:32 am

Re: Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Postby Waffles72 » Fri Oct 31, 2014 6:41 pm

If i guess right i get 50 Bajgiels, And i guess she is not guilty
Waffles72
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 12:42 am

Re: Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Postby Kandarim » Fri Oct 31, 2014 6:55 pm

i sure voted no enough times to get her acquitted
got to love plural voting systems
I have neither the crayons nor the time to explain it to you.
JC wrote:I'm not fully committed to being wrong on that yet.
User avatar
Kandarim
Customer
 
Posts: 5321
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 4:18 pm

Re: Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Postby Waffles72 » Fri Oct 31, 2014 7:10 pm

Kandarim wrote:i sure voted no enough times to get her acquitted
got to love plural voting systems

Some one owes me 50 bajgiels then
Waffles72
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 12:42 am

Re: Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Postby ericbomb » Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:46 pm

If she is voted guilty I demand a wager by battle*! If her champion is victorious then she is innocent, if the prosecutor's champion is victorious then she is guilty.

*Or trial by combat, both of which were common law at the time, since it was never addressed by a U.S. court it still is common law today, technically at least because england did not abolish it until 1819, and so common law for the thirteen colonies stayed the same. :lol:
JohnCarver wrote:I reserve the right to torch your base.

JohnCarver wrote:I am offended!
ericbomb
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 9:50 pm

Re: Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Postby summertime » Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:49 pm

punish plz those who voted for both but using different accounts (just compare ip)
summertime
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:31 pm

Re: Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Postby DarkNacht » Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:02 am

summertime wrote:punish plz those who voted for both but using different accounts (just compare ip)

same ip does not mean same person.
DarkNacht
 
Posts: 2684
Joined: Thu May 02, 2013 11:24 am

Re: Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Postby summertime » Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:03 am

DarkNacht wrote:
summertime wrote:punish plz those who voted for both but using different accounts (just compare ip)

same ip does not mean same person.


same ip means same household at least... the chances that two people in same household play salem is low

chances people use many accounts to vote in hopes of getting higher reward is high
summertime
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:31 pm

PreviousNext

Return to House of Burgesses

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests