Apologizing

Forum for In-Game politics, relations, matters of justice, and other in-game topics.

Apologizing

Postby Heffernan » Sat Oct 11, 2014 9:01 pm

Hello His/her/it Majesty

id like to Apologize for insulting the name of our Majesty and request to get mah low taxes back


Kind Regards.
User avatar
Heffernan
 
Posts: 8564
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 3:07 pm
Location: Marps Closet

Re: Apologizing

Postby JohnCarver » Sat Oct 11, 2014 9:04 pm

I just spoke with his Majesty. He accepts your apology and will be reducing your stall back to the very fair, and overly generously 35% tax rate.
ceedat wrote:the overwhelming frustration of these forums and the unnecessarily over complicated game mechanics is what i enjoy about this game most.

Nsuidara wrote:it is a strange and difficult game in no positive way
User avatar
JohnCarver
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6826
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 3:02 am

Re: Apologizing

Postby Heffernan » Sat Oct 11, 2014 9:07 pm

JohnCarver wrote:overly generously 35% tax rate.


¦]
User avatar
Heffernan
 
Posts: 8564
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 3:07 pm
Location: Marps Closet

Re: Apologizing

Postby Sephorin » Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:00 am

Seriously, you're a good sport, Heffernan. Thumbs up.
User avatar
Sephorin
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:42 am

Re: Apologizing

Postby Michael » Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:49 am

I feel like I missed something that happened in-game? Anyone care to explain the details of why this is a thread that exists?
btw, I too think His Majesty is a little *****. Why do you keep spamming Boston with mean remarks about his majesty though? you must really hate him!
Michael
 
Posts: 432
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:16 am

Re: Apologizing

Postby trungdle » Sun Oct 12, 2014 4:27 am

Michael wrote:I feel like I missed something that happened in-game? Anyone care to explain the details of why this is a thread that exists?
btw, I too think His Majesty is a little *****. Why do you keep spamming Boston with mean remarks about his majesty though? you must really hate him!

JohnCarver wrote:
Heffernan wrote:
yet the dev doesnt care right? implement broken stall system with rediculous taxes and blame the players.


His Majesty has raised the tax on YOUR stall alone to 50%. In can be lowered to the very gracious and generous 35% again Pending your apology.

http://forum.salemthegame.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=11048&start=30
You thought I quit.
User avatar
trungdle
 
Posts: 1687
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 7:20 pm
Location: Humble, Texas

Re: Apologizing

Postby alagar » Thu Oct 16, 2014 7:03 pm

Michael wrote:I feel like I missed something that happened in-game? Anyone care to explain the details of why this is a thread that exists?
btw, I too think His Majesty is a little *****. Why do you keep spamming Boston with mean remarks about his majesty though? you must really hate him!


Just jc and his authoritarian and troll personality bullying salem players.
REMOVE STALLS!
User avatar
alagar
 
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 8:13 pm

Re: Apologizing

Postby Nictos » Thu Oct 16, 2014 7:32 pm

alagar wrote:
Michael wrote:I feel like I missed something that happened in-game? Anyone care to explain the details of why this is a thread that exists?
btw, I too think His Majesty is a little *****. Why do you keep spamming Boston with mean remarks about his majesty though? you must really hate him!


Just jc and his authoritarian and troll personality bullying salem players.



He has every right to. You're not the one spending every waking moment of your life trying to make this game a better place for everyone. If he wants to be human like the rest of us, let him. He deserves it.
MarpTarpton wrote: If you need your nipples tweaked to make something look great, who's to challenge you?


John Carver wrote:Franklin 8:25
Time moves at that which Franklin moves, any 'speed' one is to interpret is relative to that of the 'holy pace'
User avatar
Nictos
 
Posts: 183
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:07 pm

Re: Apologizing

Postby lachlaan » Thu Oct 16, 2014 8:04 pm

There are worse things to be punished on this forum than a player being overly passionate about his opinion, in some cases, or a lot worse behaviours than a player that (as per the game's desires) has no clue how the game mechanics work. Let's be honest, the basic client giving as little info as possible doesn't exactly help a player to comprehend mechanics for him to be as well informed as JC would like so that a dunce hat may be avoided. Similarly, in a moment in development when our feedback is supposedly necessary, not being able to call a dev out on something you feel they're doing wrong would basically sum up to us not being needed at all for testing. I'd like to see duncehatting be less erratic and up-front and personal. Perhaps some players lose their ability to hunt a particular tier of wildlife due to their lack of hat slots, thus putting them at a disadvantage ingame, all because one of the grand wizards feels like it at the moment.

[/minirant]
Exactly 6.022 x 10^23 worth of Lach molecules.
lachlaan
Customer
 
Posts: 2043
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:11 pm

Re: Apologizing

Postby Nictos » Thu Oct 16, 2014 8:10 pm

lachlaan wrote:There are worse things to be punished on this forum than a player being overly passionate about his opinion, in some cases, or a lot worse behaviours than a player that (as per the game's desires) has no clue how the game mechanics work. Let's be honest, the basic client giving as little info as possible doesn't exactly help a player to comprehend mechanics for him to be as well informed as JC would like so that a dunce hat may be avoided. Similarly, in a moment in development when our feedback is supposedly necessary, not being able to call a dev out on something you feel they're doing wrong would basically sum up to us not being needed at all for testing. I'd like to see duncehatting be less erratic and up-front and personal. Perhaps some players lose their ability to hunt a particular tier of wildlife due to their lack of hat slots, thus putting them at a disadvantage ingame, all because one of the grand wizards feels like it at the moment.

[/minirant]



There's a difference between a well constructive opinion than just a plain lash out, you know? I think it's okay for players to say they don't like something and can give good reasons why (like you just did) than saying something alone the lines of what was said previously. There was no criticism, just cynicism.
MarpTarpton wrote: If you need your nipples tweaked to make something look great, who's to challenge you?


John Carver wrote:Franklin 8:25
Time moves at that which Franklin moves, any 'speed' one is to interpret is relative to that of the 'holy pace'
User avatar
Nictos
 
Posts: 183
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:07 pm

Next

Return to House of Burgesses

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests