Dura Lex

[JohnCarver]

I'm more concerned with getting town membership.

Lrn2TrialMember

[lachlaan]

He meant, concerned about getting town membership on an alt, as a hermit which is the mayor of his town claim, with the premise that there'd be no multi-accounting. I.E. can't attune keys to your future alt that inherits anything, can't invite him to town without both being only, can't have compacts if it's a fresh alt.

[JohnCarver]

He meant, concerned about getting town membership on an alt, as a hermit which is the mayor of his town claim, with the premise that there'd be no multi-accounting. I.E. can't attune keys to your future alt that inherits anything, can't invite him to town without both being only, can't have compacts if it's a fresh alt.

You don't need multiple accounts to put multiple characters in the same town.

[LOMS]

He meant, concerned about getting town membership on an alt, as a hermit which is the mayor of his town claim, with the premise that there'd be no multi-accounting. I.E. can't attune keys to your future alt that inherits anything, can't invite him to town without both being only, can't have compacts if it's a fresh alt.

You don't need multiple accounts to put multiple characters in the same town.

Without both being online, that's what he said. If you want to have a mayor and "citizens" on same account, you need multiple accounts or you need someone else to invite your "citizens", but "having someone" is not his case.

[lachlaan]

Since in the end JC did confirm multiple accounts are okay to have, barring weird attempts at scamming devs for item restores, I see no point in pursuing the "what if" argument for argument's sake. The solution has now again become, just have an alt account.

[JohnCarver]

Without both being online, that's what he said. If you want to have a mayor and "citizens" on same account, you need multiple accounts or you need someone else to invite your "citizens", but "having someone" is not his case.

Ah, I see, interesting argument. But no, I have no intention of changing rules or implementing mechanics to accommodate players who are unable to utilize a single friend for a 5 minute period to help them with town permissions etc. If you cannot make or find a single friend to assist in this regard, then you quite frankly do not deserve a 'town' in the first place.

Since in the end JC did confirm multiple accounts are okay to have, barring weird attempts at scamming devs for item restores, I see no point in pursuing the "what if" argument for argument's sake. The solution has now again become, just have an alt account.

This.

[LOMS]

Ah, I see, interesting argument. But no, I have no intention of changing rules or implementing mechanics to accommodate players who are unable to utilize a single friend for a 5 minute period to help them with town permissions etc. If you cannot make or find a single friend to assist in this regard, then you quite frankly do not deserve a 'town' in the first place.

Well, it's totally not a problem since you can has multiple accounts on one or multiple emails(if you not going to report yourself )

[Icon]

And it only took 6 pages...

[Potjeh]

Well I only have a town claim because it's better than a personal claim.

[JohnCarver]

Well I only have a town claim because it's better than a personal claim.

Yes, I do see this being less of an issue after the PVP patch. It never felt right to me that hermits had an advantage to maintaining a town for simply themselves.