Cosmetic legacy gardening pots

Forum for suggesting changes to Salem.

Cosmetic legacy gardening pots

Postby lachlaan » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:09 pm

In light of the future nullification of our (in some cases) wonderful gardening pots, I'd like to propose you make the old ones acquire some sort of cosmetic change based on their old elemental composition. For example my best sulphur pot could retain its old elemental composition in the form of color components, making the pot be closer to the color of its main element with increasing purity :D Not a really important thing, but it'd be fun for those of us attached to our precious pots. Want the good ones to stand out a bit, for nostalgia's sake :)
Exactly 6.022 x 10^23 worth of Lach molecules.
lachlaan
Customer
 
Posts: 2043
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:11 pm

Re: Cosmetic legacy gardening pots

Postby Pildream » Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:00 pm

that would mess up with the decay colorings i guess but indeed , knowing the pot's purity would be useful, especially for those people that "find" pots :P
User avatar
Pildream
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 2:38 pm

Re: Cosmetic legacy gardening pots

Postby lachlaan » Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:02 pm

I just meant for after they lose purity, just to have something to show for all the work test tubing materials etc etc :)
Exactly 6.022 x 10^23 worth of Lach molecules.
lachlaan
Customer
 
Posts: 2043
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:11 pm

Re: Cosmetic legacy gardening pots

Postby AmmaBoss » Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:38 pm

not a good idea
AmmaBoss
 
Posts: 379
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2013 1:15 am

Re: Cosmetic legacy gardening pots

Postby DarkNacht » Sun Aug 17, 2014 6:03 pm

I think a better idea would just be to turn all pots over a certain % into fancy pots.
DarkNacht
 
Posts: 2684
Joined: Thu May 02, 2013 11:24 am

Re: Cosmetic legacy gardening pots

Postby Rifmaster » Sun Aug 17, 2014 6:08 pm

DarkNacht wrote:I think a better idea would just be to turn all pots over a certain % into fancy pots.


I think we should be able to make fancy pots.
Cuz i want to be fancey, for the ladies ;)
Image

EDIT: im too lazy to find a good eyebrows raise, so here's a weird one, from someone that looks like justin beaver.
User avatar
Rifmaster
 
Posts: 1698
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 9:13 am
Location: Chernobyl

Re: Cosmetic legacy gardening pots

Postby lachlaan » Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:25 pm

Is that Bo Beaver? Wait no I mean Justin Burnham?
Exactly 6.022 x 10^23 worth of Lach molecules.
lachlaan
Customer
 
Posts: 2043
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:11 pm

Re: Cosmetic legacy gardening pots

Postby thais » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:30 pm

what do you mean nullification of our wonderful gardening pots? can you link me or something?
Image
User avatar
thais
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 10:26 pm

Re: Cosmetic legacy gardening pots

Postby lachlaan » Mon Aug 18, 2014 12:02 am

JohnCarver wrote:At this point in time we are designing around the idea that structures will no longer have purity. Thus we have not invested effort in making the current ones display it.


This
Exactly 6.022 x 10^23 worth of Lach molecules.
lachlaan
Customer
 
Posts: 2043
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:11 pm

Re: Cosmetic legacy gardening pots

Postby JohnCarver » Mon Aug 18, 2014 12:04 am

To be fair, we have ran into a bit of an issue with entirely removing purity from structures in our design system. We are now investigating solutions where the purity on structures is 'changed' in ways other than destroying and rebuilding the object with it.
ceedat wrote:the overwhelming frustration of these forums and the unnecessarily over complicated game mechanics is what i enjoy about this game most.

Nsuidara wrote:it is a strange and difficult game in no positive way
User avatar
JohnCarver
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6826
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 3:02 am


Return to Ideas & Innovations

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

cron