Seriously going to quit

[Dallane]

280 post and this is the only good one from frak. Good riddance now get the ***** out casual scums

[er-queent8r]

Well finally, we will be free of the frakked. This game has always been a team orientated game. The only one you have to blame about not having a team is yourself. This game is getting better with each patch everyone sees this. No one will ever will understand your thought process.

[neored9]

cya nerd

inb4 he keeps posting.

[JohnCarver]

I'm in the same school as frakked although I want to continue and try out the new stuff. However, it is annoying that now the "tailor" is king.

Again, I hope the Dev's will respect the sandbox concept, and not force people into a certain playing style (teams, or forcing up T&N) in order to have reasonable amounts of fun (kill bears, make clothes, etc.).

To be fair. I would argue a fineleathercrafter is also king. Soon there will be 10 other kings as you put it.

Players who wanted to have every skill, and do everything all by themselves without the need of seeking out, searching, or socializing for other professions will find that they simply cannot. You will either need to learn to live without the goods you cannot independently produce, or seek out a player who put focus on that profession long enough to accomplish that.

[Thor]

I rest my case, only playing with a group unleashes Salem's full potential. Group always wins against a hermit. Stronger group will overpower inferior groups. And remember, this IS a PVP game with crafting aspects, not the other way around.

[lachlaan]

I feel like people are complaining about the wrong thing. If you dislike how dangerous it is to make connections and friends, argue in favour of making trading and alliances less of a dangerous clusterfornication. For example I'd love to see a system where a crafting menu can craft materials out of barrels and drop the result in the barrel, to make it easier to hire tailors on comission. Otherwise there'd be the risk the tailor would keep the good result to himself and swap it for one of his older failures. This way you could see the resulting comissioned clothing article and know you were ripped off to give bad rep at least. It's all just an extension to the current trading system, provided there will be ways to do it without just losing out every time.

But yeah, mechanics that make socialization more appealing > asking to be able to play singleplayer just as well as an army of other people.

[neored9]

I feel like people are complaining about the wrong thing. If you dislike how dangerous it is to make connections and friends, argue in favour of making trading and alliances less of a dangerous clusterfornication. For example I'd love to see a system where a crafting menu can craft materials out of barrels and drop the result in the barrel, to make it easier to hire tailors on comission. Otherwise there'd be the risk the tailor would keep the good result to himself and swap it for one of his older failures. This way you could see the resulting comissioned clothing article and know you were ripped off to give bad rep at least. It's all just an extension to the current trading system, provided there will be ways to do it without just losing out every time.

But yeah, mechanics that make socialization more appealing > asking to be able to play singleplayer just as well as an army of other people.

These new updates always bring out the dumbest of ideas.

[lachlaan]

These new updates always bring out the dumbest of ideas.

And contentless posts too. Feel free to argue against any aspect of my idea at least
The fact remains that you'll leave a "scent" without witnesses on a claim much earlier than CSI even existed, but you won't leave a theft scent from ripping someone off in a crowded square in town. Some systems should be put in place to counter that I think, and it would certainly spice things up if comissioning crafters was also a viable thing, rather than just the crafter spamming clothes and varying price per quality of his goods.

[JohnCarver]

And contentless posts too. Feel free to argue against any aspect of my idea at least
The fact remains that you'll leave a "scent" without witnesses on a claim much earlier than CSI even existed, but you won't leave a theft scent from ripping someone off in a crowded square in town. Some systems should be put in place to counter that I think, and it would certainly spice things up if comissioning crafters was also a viable thing, rather than just the crafter spamming clothes and varying price per quality of his goods.

I would argue that commissioning crafters is still a viable thing. Just something you must use caution with to make sure it is crafters you can trust.

[Feone]

And contentless posts too. Feel free to argue against any aspect of my idea at least
The fact remains that you'll leave a "scent" without witnesses on a claim much earlier than CSI even existed, but you won't leave a theft scent from ripping someone off in a crowded square in town. Some systems should be put in place to counter that I think, and it would certainly spice things up if comissioning crafters was also a viable thing, rather than just the crafter spamming clothes and varying price per quality of his goods.

I would argue that commissioning crafters is still a viable thing. Just something you must use caution with to make sure it is crafters you can trust.

That only works if it is possible to tell. Switching out awesome results for something less nice is undetectable.