TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
Darwoth wrote: if you only knew the long twisting story that grew out of that whole fiasco, finally ending in the massacre at darwoth forest
TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
JohnCarver wrote: I disagree that is a bug and simply think its a mechanic that could be better refined.
Dallane wrote:Darwoth wrote: if you only knew the long twisting story that grew out of that whole fiasco, finally ending in the massacre at darwoth forest
Sucks that the "story" that you "will eventually will post" will never actually be a "story"
lachlaan wrote:]
The fact of the matter is that every single bug could become a potential mechanic, the issue with this is that it's unintuitive what exactly you would feel is an okay mechanic until you state that it's an okay mechanic or not. So as of your latest announced stance on bug correction and abuse, anything goes as long as we can find loopholes within your three "rules", and if we can paint the bug as a fun potential mechanic that will also gain us cookie points and a free pass. Like I said, horses jump walls, there's even a real life sport revolving around that. Heck, had Paul had the foresight to use a disposable alt to abuse the bug with, and let it die, that would've put him one step closer to a free pass. Clearly when scents are involved in someone dying to bug abuse, the victim's direct action of leaving a scent is what puts them at fault for their own death, therefore 2 out of three conditions are no longer met, and restorations become a thing of the past. Please re-word or revise your restoration conditions for loopholes such as the "make a murder alt and make sure it dies in the process", and please consider the easy solution that an unintended mechanic be considered a bug until it is either reported and disclaimed as a bug, or officially announced by the dev team as an intended mechanic.
Darwoth wrote:lachlaan wrote:]
The fact of the matter is that every single bug could become a potential mechanic, the issue with this is that it's unintuitive what exactly you would feel is an okay mechanic until you state that it's an okay mechanic or not. So as of your latest announced stance on bug correction and abuse, anything goes as long as we can find loopholes within your three "rules", and if we can paint the bug as a fun potential mechanic that will also gain us cookie points and a free pass. Like I said, horses jump walls, there's even a real life sport revolving around that. Heck, had Paul had the foresight to use a disposable alt to abuse the bug with, and let it die, that would've put him one step closer to a free pass. Clearly when scents are involved in someone dying to bug abuse, the victim's direct action of leaving a scent is what puts them at fault for their own death, therefore 2 out of three conditions are no longer met, and restorations become a thing of the past. Please re-word or revise your restoration conditions for loopholes such as the "make a murder alt and make sure it dies in the process", and please consider the easy solution that an unintended mechanic be considered a bug until it is either reported and disclaimed as a bug, or officially announced by the dev team as an intended mechanic.
they left all of their gates open and carried cursed items inside, the competely unrelated horse issue was simply a method of walking through walls entirely without any input on the part of the victims. additionally your example is stupid, a horse can jump approximately 5 feet high on average, which is shorter than my privacy fence, much less anything considered to be a wall.
Feone wrote:Not knowing of a completely undocumented & counterintuitive mechanic isn't part of the idiocy though.
lachlaan wrote:JohnCarver wrote: I disagree that is a bug and simply think its a mechanic that could be better refined.
I think my opinion is more important than the dev
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests