The Offical Petition To Ban Claeyt

Forum for off topic and general discussion.

Do you want claeyt banned?

Poll ended at Fri Jun 27, 2014 12:34 am

Yes
38
75%
Yes
13
25%
 
Total votes : 51

Re: The Offical Petition To Ban Claeyt

Postby Voltaire1512 » Fri Jun 20, 2014 1:59 pm

neored9 wrote:LOL get a load of this guy. I know who my next thread is gonna be about.


I certainly feel honored, my good Sir. :)
Voltaire1512
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: The Offical Petition To Ban Claeyt

Postby Dallane » Fri Jun 20, 2014 2:37 pm

Claeyt wrote:
jorb wrote:Yupp. Ban. Vox populi, vox Dei! ¦]

You should have done it while you had the chance. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Veritas est veritas unius hominis.

You've already been warned once tonight, Claeyt, for inappropriate material. User banned one day for lack of English translation.

TotalyMeow


IT WORKED!!!!
Please click this link for a better salem forum experience

TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
User avatar
Dallane
Moderator
 
Posts: 15195
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 2:00 pm

Re: The Offical Petition To Ban Claeyt

Postby Kaios » Fri Jun 20, 2014 2:46 pm

neored9 wrote:Prove him wrong! Protip, you can't.


What? My "stfu" was in regards to the clear double standard that was just displayed. If Claeyt hadn't been warned already, it would have just been a warning rather than a ban. But Jorb is allowed without repercussion because why exactly? His ***** taste too damn good?
Kaios
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:25 am

Re: The Offical Petition To Ban Claeyt

Postby neored9 » Fri Jun 20, 2014 2:50 pm

Kaios wrote:
neored9 wrote:Prove him wrong! Protip, you can't.


What? My "stfu" was in regards to the clear double standard that was just displayed. If Claeyt hadn't been warned already, it would have just been a warning rather than a ban. But Jorb is allowed without repercussion because why exactly? His ***** taste too damn good?


Herp derp.
User avatar
neored9
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:28 pm

Re: The Offical Petition To Ban Claeyt

Postby Orcling » Fri Jun 20, 2014 2:51 pm

Kaios wrote:
neored9 wrote:Prove him wrong! Protip, you can't.


What? My "stfu" was in regards to the clear double standard that was just displayed. If Claeyt hadn't been warned already, it would have just been a warning rather than a ban. But Jorb is allowed without repercussion because why exactly? His ***** taste too damn good?


Because jorb is a special little snowflake with extra rights. Kinda like the ex-president of a country, who still has some say in the new government.
User avatar
Orcling
 
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:53 pm

Re: The Offical Petition To Ban Claeyt

Postby loftar » Fri Jun 20, 2014 4:13 pm

Kaios wrote:What? My "stfu" was in regards to the clear double standard that was just displayed. If Claeyt hadn't been warned already, it would have just been a warning rather than a ban. But Jorb is allowed without repercussion because why exactly? His ***** taste too damn good?

Because modestia principum temperantia est legum. [Lex Visigothorum, Book I, Title II] ^^
User avatar
loftar
 
Posts: 1021
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 7:32 am
Location: In your character database, shuffling bits

Re: The Offical Petition To Ban Claeyt

Postby Potjeh » Fri Jun 20, 2014 4:17 pm

Quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi.
Potjeh
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:26 pm

Re: The Offical Petition To Ban Claeyt

Postby Kaios » Fri Jun 20, 2014 4:20 pm

Don't know what you guys are saying, please provide translation as per the rules of the forum.
Kaios
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:25 am

Re: The Offical Petition To Ban Claeyt

Postby Kandarim » Fri Jun 20, 2014 4:22 pm

per the legacy rules, latin and classic greek is allowed in posts :)
It seems that rule got lost during the change of power.

Ah well, tempora mutantur
I have neither the crayons nor the time to explain it to you.
JC wrote:I'm not fully committed to being wrong on that yet.
User avatar
Kandarim
Customer
 
Posts: 5321
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 4:18 pm

Re: The Offical Petition To Ban Claeyt

Postby Voltaire1512 » Fri Jun 20, 2014 4:43 pm

Potjeh wrote:Quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi.


Si tacuisses, philosophus mansisses.
Voltaire1512
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 6:06 pm

PreviousNext

Return to City upon a Hill

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests