Jalpha wrote:Okay the PMH seems to be nothing more than a highly inefficient battery, with a long shelf life. It's applications are limited. If it works it has nothing at all to do with perpetual motion, that's obviously a catchphrase as part of a publicity stunt, or just born of ignorance.
Well the PMH itself is pretty useless atleast the one that they demonstrate with, but im fairly sure it could be worked upon to get a stronger effect and combine it with something else. I never claimed it would create any energy and it probably doesn't. My intention was just to try to prove the continuous motion in it.
Anyways, Leedskalnin himself was born 1887 according to wiki and probably invented his PMH at around 1910-1920. So it's old, just not very known. He also wrote a book about magnetism, wich i bought and i am still reading, it's quite intresting. And there is alot of unanswered questions in how he built his coral castle.
Question for you: How is it not perpetual motion? or should i say perpetual flow of energy. Aren't those basically the same things? One could also claim that the earths orbit around the sun is perpetual motion.
Jalpha wrote:I do have a question for you though. If free energy was released tomorrow, and everyone had one of these in their backyard... What do you seriously think the consequences would be?.
Well there would for sure be great panic and hysteria in the oil companies. But that aside. I don't really know for sure. Alot of jobs would be eventually lost, and stock market would get turbulent, it would also create more jobs to install and plan the new systems. Even if theese devices would just appear and everyone had one, most people wouldn't know how to use them or connect them. Change would happen slowly when society adapts to a new system, it would require alot of infrastructural change. It would be pretty chaotic i think, but that's always what happens when there is times of change.
New systems always get implement gradually and spread outwards slowly when they also get better and more efficient when science behind it gets more polished and understood.
Im not afraid that it would get misused, since there is plenty of room for misuse in our current society already if one would want to do it.
Tamasin wrote:accusations
thrive and many others are the ones that spread the vision of a better future. They don't necesary have all the answers, nor do i. But they are trying their best to get people to think differently, they are pointing out the faults in our current society. You just don't spawn products and lifestyles infront of you, you need an idea first and then you develop it and it grows and hopefully sees the light of day.
You are still denying everything i say or most of what's said in the movie. You didn't point out any specific faults. You are saying the facts are not there. Wich of the facts are missing if i may ask? the only thing you have said is that because david icke was in the movie and in your logic, according to what you wrote, then the whole rest of movie is a fraud and bs. Let's put david icke in the cnn news to say hello, then that defaults the whole show and the rest of the news as bs lies and crazy. Well done. You claim to be logical, now prove it and represent your facts that nullify my facts.