Dallane wrote:LampostSamurai wrote:
It wouldn't get fixed anyway. The devs have abandoned salem.
No they haven't
Ah?
Jorb wrote:The games are not equivalent from an economic standpoint. We originally began working on Salem -- setting Haven & Hearth aside -- for monetary reasons that no longer are. While we receive the majority of the income that Salem generates (a humble amount), it still remains the case that the game is not entirely ours, but a joint venture with Paradox, unlike Haven. Ceteris paribus our incentives are, naturally, to prioritize our own development. This has always been the case, and our shifting priorities have always simply reflected underlying economics. It is not the case that we prioritize one game over the other just because ***** it, and nor do I believe it an accurate description that our decisions are fickle.
Or
Jorb wrote: Simply maintaining the game is not much of an effort, however, so we are in no immediate rush to get out of the project either. If some kind patrician came along wanting to offer all parties considered due compensation for the game then perhaps there could be room for deliberations on such a matter, but until that situation actually materializes I do not see much recourse other than our keeping keeping on.
To the extent that it is possible you might perhaps consider simply enjoying the game for what it is.
Hell, that whole "Jorb where art thou..." thread paints an... unflattering of the developer's interest in continuing the game.