loftar wrote:***** the treaty.
jorb wrote:you fat-fingered, trigger happy nabbly-boos.
loftar wrote:***** the treaty.
Cheena wrote:I've heard that placing a personnal claim over a scent was a nice option aswell, since it can be destroyed only on certain occasions. That means that as long as you pay your claim -and that noone town claim it- noone could pick the scent(s) it covers.
...I guess that it's the kind of mechanics Chief wouldn't want me to explain people, I'll make him angry at me again >.>
Cheena wrote:I've heard that placing a personnal claim over a scent was a nice option aswell, since it can be destroyed only on certain occasions. That means that as long as you pay your claim -and that noone town claim it- noone could pick the scent(s) it covers.
...I guess that it's the kind of mechanics Chief wouldn't want me to explain people, I'll make him angry at me again >.>
We Have MOST Fun on Jamestown!
ZtyX wrote:Cheena wrote:I've heard that placing a personnal claim over a scent was a nice option aswell, since it can be destroyed only on certain occasions. That means that as long as you pay your claim -and that noone town claim it- noone could pick the scent(s) it covers.
...I guess that it's the kind of mechanics Chief wouldn't want me to explain people, I'll make him angry at me again >.>
So that's why Chief was carrying around a bunch of writs of homesteading in that video.
ZtyX wrote:Cheena wrote:I've heard that placing a personnal claim over a scent was a nice option aswell, since it can be destroyed only on certain occasions. That means that as long as you pay your claim -and that noone town claim it- noone could pick the scent(s) it covers.
...I guess that it's the kind of mechanics Chief wouldn't want me to explain people, I'll make him angry at me again >.>
So that's why Chief was carrying around a bunch of writs of homesteading in that video.
cept when you have 'clue' added in your radar.
loftar wrote:***** the treaty.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 262 guests