Page 7 of 10

Re: The Second Age Treaty

PostPosted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 1:39 am
by Claeyt
Mushibag wrote:Shut up, Claeyt. We all found out that Darwoth was with Tribe from the Chief's reply to YOU.


jwhitehorn wrote:
Claeyt wrote:Eventually the Tribe will find Darwoth and all hell will break loose. :lol:


The Tribal Council has had many a discussion about the seriousness of the Claegue. While it is true that there is a bumpy history with the one known as Darwoth we have determined that in the times ahead we shall require a Surgeon General and he shall be affiliated as "Tribal Horde". Thus, he shall not be bound to the rules of the Treaty, nor shall we hunt or pursue him as his aims in this world are noble and his pursuit one of justice.

We will be educating Treaty members about the Claegue to ensure that the disease does not spread among the enlightened. Treaty Members who take action to spread the Claegue will lose their treaty-status.

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe

So it's True. Darwoth has joined the Tribe. Wow.

How much you want to bet he terrorizes 10 tribal members with his free pass before he ever finds out where I live.

Re: The Second Age Treaty

PostPosted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 2:16 am
by Darwoth
see claeyt? look what you have done!

Re: The Second Age Treaty

PostPosted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 3:16 am
by Binks
LOL! He had to bold and underline what chief said to help himself understand the situation. It was very Claegue of him.

Re: The Second Age Treaty

PostPosted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 3:54 am
by solitude
God, the second age has not started yet but the clague is already rearing its ugly head. Some1 make it stop talking.

Re: The Second Age Treaty

PostPosted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:23 am
by Ikpeip
Good evening,

The transparent (and pretty "JV") attempts to manipulate Darwoth in this thread by hyping his relationship with the Tribe are pretty laughable.

The attempts to manipulate Tribal politics by pointing out Darwoth might crawfish are also not quite up to snuff.

These follies only further accentuate the rot that has addled your wits.

Faithfully,

-Peter

Re: The Second Age Treaty

PostPosted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:33 am
by Gallient
Ikpeip wrote:
Faithfully,

-Peter


Wat!?

Re: The Second Age Treaty

PostPosted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:37 am
by Darwoth
Gallient wrote:
Ikpeip wrote:
Faithfully,

-Peter


Wat!?




should not be surprised, it is pretty obvious that the claegue robbed paul to pay peter.

Re: The Second Age Treaty

PostPosted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 9:23 am
by Procne
Ikpeip wrote:Good evening,

The transparent (and pretty "JV") attempts to manipulate Darwoth in this thread by hyping his relationship with the Tribe are pretty laughable.

The attempts to manipulate Tribal politics by pointing out Darwoth might crawfish are also not quite up to snuff.

These follies only further accentuate the rot that has addled your wits.

Faithfully,

-Peter


Come on, don't go defensive mode. We both know that Darwoth has a history of going on killing sprees every now and then. Especially that he has already threatened that he will do just that - killing as many characters as he can.
With the tribe apparently being the only faction so far, one might want to join the treaty in order to play in relative peace. But then the contents of this thread make me doubt it. We have Darwoth threatening and using excuse of a "claegue" to call anyone he wants an enemy. For all I know one could get killed for simply asking questions. Or for being a newb / casual player, and Darwoth hates those with passion.

So far I haven't seen any serious statement made by the tribe or Darwoth which would clearly indicate the nature of the relationship between the both parties and what does it mean for treaty payers. Especially that this "claegue" is not mentioned anywhere in the treaty and so far I have seen it being used as "I don't agree with you, you have cleague" argument. Which leads me to believe that Darwoth or the tribe can use this argument whenever they want and just get rid of the treaty payer.

Another thing that is worrying to me is the "TMs shall not conspire against the Tribe, or work to weaken their interests" rule. I think it needs explanation as to what exactly "work to weaken their interests" means. Will the tribe come and say "you have to buy 10 bars of iron, 200s each, from the tribe" because "the tribe needs silver and not buying those bars will weaken our interests"? Or is it limited only to physically attacking the tribe or any of the treaty payers, as well as supporting known enemies of the tribe with silver / items / information?

I think you can agree that many things have been said in recent weeks which may confuse the "common playerbase", so it would be good to resolve all the ambiguity.

Re: The Second Age Treaty

PostPosted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 9:28 am
by Darwoth
if the details given do not suit you then feel free to disregard the entire thing and get your face cut off.

Re: The Second Age Treaty

PostPosted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 9:45 am
by Darwoth
also i have nothing against newbs lol, i have helped many. including several of the "veterans" you see on these forums when they were starting out.

what i do NOT like are annoying retards, just so happens 90% of this game are made up of said group including newbs.