Salem-Wiki Tribe Endorsed

Ask and answer any and all questions pertaining to Salem's game-play.

Re: Salem-Wiki Tribe Endorsed

Postby Kandarim » Sat Nov 16, 2013 2:32 pm

Small note: the page for highlander's sporran is missing
I have neither the crayons nor the time to explain it to you.
JC wrote:I'm not fully committed to being wrong on that yet.
User avatar
Kandarim
Customer
 
Posts: 5321
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 4:18 pm

Re: Salem-Wiki Tribe Endorsed

Postby sabinati » Sat Nov 16, 2013 4:53 pm

going to address a few points here:

jwhitehorn wrote:Why Not Improve the Old One?
We tried. No less than (3) Tribal affiliates had their work tainted, deleted, or their accounts deleted by the admins of the other wiki.

This is categorically false. If someone edited or deleted your content, it was not an admin, it was another regular user this is the nature of a wiki. no accounts have been deleted.

jwhitehorn wrote:The old wiki is maintained by players who have long since quit and/or been run off from the game and it is speculated that they were removing our content for purely political reasons.

The old wiki is maintained by whoever wants to maintain it, again, this is the nature of a wiki. If active players are not maintaining it then there is nobody to blame but the active playerbase for not contributing.

jwhitehorn wrote:While it is more time/money/ and effort to maintain our own we found that not having our content removed and our wiki accounts banned was well worth it.


alloin wrote:
MagicManICT wrote: it may have been pure politics.

Even I was banned for submitting legit information !

the only bans that have been issued were for spam/bots.
Admin for Salem Wiki • Make suggestions or complaints in the Wiki Suggestion thread
User avatar
sabinati
 
Posts: 1135
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:48 am

Re: Salem-Wiki Tribe Endorsed

Postby jwhitehorn » Sat Nov 16, 2013 9:05 pm

Assuming your claims are true then it is a failure on behalf of the Admins to eliminate the "members' who were removing legitimate content.

Also Alloin wasn't bannned? I could have sworn I remember back in the day when he was.

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe
Admin for Salem Wiki • Make suggestions or complaints in the Wiki Suggestion thread
User avatar
jwhitehorn
 
Posts: 5307
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: Salem-Wiki Tribe Endorsed

Postby jwhitehorn » Sat Nov 16, 2013 9:19 pm

Kandarim wrote:Small note: the page for highlander's sporran is missing


http://www.salem-wiki.com/mediawiki/ind ... 7s_Sporran

Any chance I could get you to import the tool-tip graphic?

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe
Admin for Salem Wiki • Make suggestions or complaints in the Wiki Suggestion thread
User avatar
jwhitehorn
 
Posts: 5307
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: Salem-Wiki Tribe Endorsed

Postby Kandarim » Sat Nov 16, 2013 10:22 pm

jwhitehorn wrote:Any chance I could get you to import the tool-tip graphic?

done
I have neither the crayons nor the time to explain it to you.
JC wrote:I'm not fully committed to being wrong on that yet.
User avatar
Kandarim
Customer
 
Posts: 5321
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 4:18 pm

Re: Salem-Wiki Tribe Endorsed

Postby jwhitehorn » Sat Nov 16, 2013 10:26 pm

Kandarim wrote:
jwhitehorn wrote:Any chance I could get you to import the tool-tip graphic?

done


Thanks :)

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe
Admin for Salem Wiki • Make suggestions or complaints in the Wiki Suggestion thread
User avatar
jwhitehorn
 
Posts: 5307
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: Salem-Wiki Tribe Endorsed

Postby Amour_Vulpes » Sat Nov 16, 2013 10:35 pm

-Scissors.-
Last edited by Amour_Vulpes on Fri Dec 13, 2013 4:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Amour_Vulpes
 
Posts: 233
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 9:23 pm
Location: United States of America

Re: Salem-Wiki Tribe Endorsed

Postby jwhitehorn » Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:36 am

Amour_Vulpes wrote:Well, if it counts, in-which it does not, I support this wiki.

Admittedly there are obvious signs of pro-MM Tribe propaganda, though I'm against all propaganda my nature, not person reasons, it is confined to lore primarily. The information is very clear, alike to the other wiki in that regard, yet also updated by people who seem to actually care. I've been primary using it for the past day and see no error in the information I'm reading. Even cross checking and the MM-Wiki has more content, in regards to information of course, than the default wiki.

Love the work you submitted. Keep it up as it is good to have community support in this regard.


Thank you. We have allocated approx. 20 hours of Tribe resources towards the improvement of this wiki. But if there is anything you would like to see prioritized please let me know.

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe
Admin for Salem Wiki • Make suggestions or complaints in the Wiki Suggestion thread
User avatar
jwhitehorn
 
Posts: 5307
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: Salem-Wiki Tribe Endorsed

Postby sabinati » Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:29 am

jwhitehorn wrote:Assuming your claims are true then it is a failure on behalf of the Admins to eliminate the "members' who were removing legitimate content.


no, it's a failure of someone to complain about their "legitimate content" being removed

Also Alloin wasn't bannned? I could have sworn I remember back in the day when he was.


no. wikis are fairly transparent in this regard: http://salemwiki.info/index.php/Special ... ?limit=500
Admin for Salem Wiki • Make suggestions or complaints in the Wiki Suggestion thread
User avatar
sabinati
 
Posts: 1135
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:48 am

Re: Salem-Wiki Tribe Endorsed

Postby ZtyX » Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:56 am

jwhitehorn wrote:
Thank you. We have allocated approx. 20 hours of Tribe resources towards the improvement of this wiki. But if there is anything you would like to see prioritized please let me know.

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe



Why only 20 hours?
We Have MOST Fun on Jamestown!
Image
User avatar
ZtyX
 
Posts: 709
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 6:48 am

PreviousNext

Return to Help!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 356 guests