jakhollin wrote:Champie wrote:jakhollin wrote:Normally I do not trash on you man but really? ...The statement was a thief tells you they only steal from abandoned pclaims. how did they know the claims were abandoned they walked in and tried to bash it.... That means that the thief did not know if it was abandoned they simply made the assumptions and guessed correctly. In the occasion they guess incorrectly they cannot truly say they only steal from abandoned claims...
I hate to call you out on your jack-holing, but...
bash != steal
Plus, if a thief bashes a wall and destroys a claim stone, nothing he takes from the nonexistent claim can be considered stolen.
Also, use some ***** punctuation. Your post was hardly worth reading, and less so with the infantile grammar.
A summon-able scent is punishable nothing more nothing less. I will repeat again a person who vandalizes or steals from a claim can not be sure if the person is active or not. All I was pointing out was that the act alone is still a crime and using a personal defense of "I only commit crimes against abandoned claims" is a bull **** statement. BTW you miss-spelled my name and your punctuation sucks to blah blah blah. See I can be childish like you as well.
in this case the thief/basher was so nice to not just ko him and beat his face and let him lay there for another 24h while he loots his "nub place"
