'Murica and France

You're just being butthurted because we ruined your country in WWI, and we ruined your moves thanks to the resistance during WWII.
But yes, you can trust me ^_^
But yes, you can trust me ^_^
Cheena wrote:You're just being butthurted because we ruined your country in WWI, and we ruined your moves thanks to the resistance during WWII.
But yes, you can trust me ^_^
Orcling wrote:Cheena wrote:You're just being butthurted because we ruined your country in WWI, and we ruined your moves thanks to the resistance during WWII.
But yes, you can trust me ^_^
French didn't ruin much of germany in ww1, aside from the treaty of versailles. Most of german/french fighting in ww1 was fought on french soil. You should refreshen your history knowledge a bit.
Dallane wrote:Orcling wrote:Cheena wrote:You're just being butthurted because we ruined your country in WWI, and we ruined your moves thanks to the resistance during WWII.
But yes, you can trust me ^_^
French didn't ruin much of germany in ww1, aside from the treaty of versailles. Most of german/french fighting in ww1 was fought on french soil. You should refreshen your history knowledge a bit.
YEAH THATS WHAT MURICA DID. PULLED YOU OUT OF THE FIRE FOR GLORIOUS VICTORY
BACK TO BACK WORLD WAR CHAMPS
USA USA USA USA USA USA
Dallane wrote:Orcling wrote:Cheena wrote:You're just being butthurted because we ruined your country in WWI, and we ruined your moves thanks to the resistance during WWII.
But yes, you can trust me ^_^
French didn't ruin much of germany in ww1, aside from the treaty of versailles. Most of german/french fighting in ww1 was fought on french soil. You should refreshen your history knowledge a bit.
YEAH THATS WHAT MURICA DID. PULLED YOU OUT OF THE FIRE FOR GLORIOUS VICTORY
BACK TO BACK WORLD WAR CHAMPS
Claeyt wrote:Of Course America wouldn't even have existed if the French hadn't intervened and sent troops to help the American colonies actually win the Revolutionary War against England.
Trenial wrote:Dafuq does the American War of Independence have ***** to do with winning back to back World Wars? Indeed at the time France did kick ass and take names. Having a global military force of 300,000 highly trained and modern equipped soldiers, plus their ridiculous navy and political ties to Spain. England had some 96,000 men strong globally, a battered Navy, a chicken **** named Lord nelson to supress the rebellion and only 40,000 softened veterans who hadn't seen combat in over a decade to deal with a contigent population over two and a half million citizens.
Its rather obvious Claeyt, so elts not state the obvious anymore.