Sigh. Salem is failing proof inside.

Forum for off topic and general discussion.

Sigh. Salem is failing proof inside.

Postby Binks » Sun Sep 15, 2013 11:49 pm

There are more people watching someone play Runescape than there is people playing Salem

http://www.twitch.tv/directory/game/RuneScape

Image
User avatar
Binks
 
Posts: 1515
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:39 pm

Re: Sigh. Salem is failing proof inside.

Postby Threehead » Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:11 am

Or, Runescape is failing so much that it's become magnetic.
Threehead
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2013 8:56 pm

Re: Sigh. Salem is failing proof inside.

Postby Shenkho » Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:37 am

Binks wrote:There are more people watching someone play Runescape than there is people playing Salem

http://www.twitch.tv/directory/game/RuneScape

Image


Well i can only tell that the developer din't spend alot of money on publicity , i only came on this game randomly on youtube , haha

Edit : oh and i assume perm death dont really attrack people either? and seen the game is same as HnH so i assume people just dont wanna restart here or like it there better.
Enjoy your play.
And don't forget ,
This is MADNESS! , no this is SALEM!
User avatar
Shenkho
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:18 pm

Re: Sigh. Salem is failing proof inside.

Postby MagicManICT » Mon Sep 16, 2013 2:27 am

Shenkho wrote:Edit : oh and i assume perm death dont really attrack people either? and seen the game is same as HnH so i assume people just dont wanna restart here or like it there better.


The game is in a bit of development limbo at the moment. There was a lot of content added over the last year, but not a lot of bug fixes and balancing, and some of the balancing (or lack thereof) has made the game unsavory for some. They (the devs) are also working on two games and would like to work on their first one, too.
I am a moderator. I moderate stuff. When I do, I write in this color.
JohnCarver wrote:anybody who argues to remove a mechanic that allows "yet another" way to summon somebody is really a carebear in disguise trying to save his own hide.
MagicManICT
 
Posts: 5088
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:46 am

Re: Sigh. Salem is failing proof inside.

Postby Jalpha » Mon Sep 16, 2013 3:08 am

Good thing the tribe spent so much of their energy steamrolling noobs. That was always going to keep people playing.

RIP Plymouth.

Seriously though this game was never going to grow massive on its own. They kinda needed to convince the Haven crowd to migrate over, and things could have grown from there. It's the way Blizzard does so well. BNet kiddies are a massive playerbase that migrate from game to game as they are released.

But that's my opinion.
Professor Gu Zhongmao wrote:These projects are beautiful to scientists, but nightmarish to engineers
User avatar
Jalpha
 
Posts: 1044
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:04 am

Re: Sigh. Salem is failing proof inside.

Postby Thor » Mon Sep 16, 2013 4:40 am

Good thing that players like kids from BNet don't really migrate well into this game (oh the ***** at Boston chatbox...) Although more players would be nice.
saltmummy wrote:You sad sad little man, my heart weeps for you. Better not go outside or your thin, tissue paper like skin might spontaneously rupture while your fragile sensibilities violently shatter spraying salt and urine all over the street.
User avatar
Thor
 
Posts: 2335
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 10:09 am

Re: Sigh. Salem is failing proof inside.

Postby deutch » Mon Sep 16, 2013 5:45 am

H & H in the aftermath of death is not as sad as in Salem.
and even developed could enter a condition in the raid, there is no trace of the crime of participants in the inventory of the village - a claim not raised. I think it would be more honest!
God will judge!(Priest)
deutch
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 9:21 am
Location: Plymouth

Re: Sigh. Salem is failing proof inside.

Postby Claeyt » Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:08 am

Both Jamestown and Roanoke went well over 60 as their peak yesterday. That's a huge gain for Jamestown and the best Roanoke has done since before the recent bad times. Plymouth of course is dead and barely able to hit 20, and it's still shedding players.

http://forum.salemthegame.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=7698
http://forum.salemthegame.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=7697

population.png
Plymouth is a Dead Server
population.png (26.75 KiB) Viewed 3588 times
jorb wrote:(jwhitehorn) you are an ungrateful, spoiled child


As the river rolled over the cliffs, my own laughing joy was drowned out by the roaring deluge of the water. The great cataract of Darwoth's Tears fell over and over endlessly.
User avatar
Claeyt
 
Posts: 5166
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 4:02 pm

Re: Sigh. Salem is failing proof inside.

Postby Binks » Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:02 am

Claeyt wrote:Both Jamestown and Roanoke went well over 60 as their peak yesterday. That's a huge gain for Jamestown and the best Roanoke has done since before the recent bad times. Plymouth of course is dead and barely able to hit 20, and it's still shedding players.

http://forum.salemthegame.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=7698
http://forum.salemthegame.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=7697

population.png


There was over 2000 people watching someone else play runescape. Yet you are happy about 60 people being online in Salem............

Image
User avatar
Binks
 
Posts: 1515
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:39 pm

Re: Sigh. Salem is failing proof inside.

Postby Roninsword » Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:06 am

What could we do to reach that kind of player base? Could you imagine how fun that would be?
Everyone throw out some ideas.
jwhitehorn wrote:God damn your stuipd.....
Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe
User avatar
Roninsword
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 5:22 am

Next

Return to City upon a Hill

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 11 guests