TEXAS vs france vs terrorists

[Heffernan]

That's mighty fine by me. What else do you expect?
Again, welcome to Texas. How can we help you? Click clark.
We can care less about other's choices in life.

Honestly Texas is by far one of the least discriminatory places that I have ever been. At least in San Antonio and Austin. Not sure about up north.

[Dallane]

Heff I guess you had a bad experience in Texas. You need to stay out of the school districts and people won't harass you. Doesn't look good for a single man child to be chilling at the playgrounds ALL day eating doritos and drinking mountain dew..


Darwoth you like one of my carry pieces? Think it will look better in a leg holster or a shoulder rig when I can open carry?

[Leō]

Personally, I view gun idiots like Dallane and Darwoth like anti-vaccination moms. The mom's think it's better if they don't have to make society safer by vaccinating their kids. Darwoth and Dallane think that more guns make society and their households safer. They can't believe the simple science that more vaccinated kids (or in Darwoth and Dallane's case: less gun owners) will make the world safer for everyone.

How does vaccination even compare to a civil right endowed upon us by our Constitution? State & Federal Governments can force people to be vaccinated; has been that way since quarantine laws in the 1700s. If you have a problem with people wishing to be armed then feel free to join the military to fight the people who want to do harm unto our nation. You'll find your opinion is limited. Tell my friends in it as well so they can express their opinions as well. Small tip: They joined like most others after 2001 to kills these sick ***** who come here to do mass shootings.

Darwoth you like one of my carry pieces? Think it will look better in a leg holster or a shoulder rig when I can open carry?

I'd suggest a .38 or a 9mm in a smaller handgun to make it easier to conceal if you ever wish to do such. A 1911 is a nice firearm as it is but it is a bit bulky; though it preforms similar to a modern 9mm handgun as the ballistics of the 9mm have been refined enough. I'd still stick with the 1911 though; bigger chunk of lead for the poor bastard to have pulled out of their body.

Should still have a concealed knife though. Never know when you'll need it and its the same as a firearm: You want it when the time comes as there will be no other time.

[Dallane]

Darwoth you like one of my carry pieces? Think it will look better in a leg holster or a shoulder rig when I can open carry?

I'd suggest a .38 or a 9mm in a smaller handgun to make it easier to conceal if you ever wish to do such. A 1911 is a nice firearm as it is but it is a bit bulky; though it preforms similar to a modern 9mm handgun as the ballistics of the 9mm have been refined enough. I'd still stick with the 1911 though; bigger chunk of lead for the poor bastard to have pulled out of their body.

Should still have a concealed knife though. Never know when you'll need it and its the same as a firearm: You want it when the time comes as there will be no other time.

I can conceal a 1911 without a issue most of the time. I love the mp9 shield for those light tshirt days. I REALLY want to get a colt python next just because I love wheel guns and that one is amazing. There is a French revolver that is compared to it that I would also love to get my hands on.

[Argentis]

Personally, I view gun idiots like Dallane and Darwoth like anti-vaccination moms. The mom's think it's better if they don't have to make society safer by vaccinating their kids. Darwoth and Dallane think that more guns make society and their households safer. They can't believe the simple science that more vaccinated kids (or in Darwoth and Dallane's case: less gun owners) will make the world safer for everyone.

There is a problem with your argument here. Anti-vaccination moms are subject to a fallacy. They believe that vaccination either not work or cause autism. Both untrue.
However for pro-guns it is still a fallacy but less so. It's true that more guns would make society and households safer, but only if everyone are responsible. Which is obviously not the case. Less gun owners doesn't make the world safer for everyone though. What would make the world safer is either a) all gun owners to be responsible or b) No gun owners at all. Ever again.

[trungdle]

Which means that the world is never to be safe. That is why we let the ones who care to legally own his gun, giving him a chance to stand up for his own safety.
The bads, well, they will have a gun anyway, no matter we let them or not.

[Dallane]

We should ban alcohol while we are at it. Would stop all the drunk driving. I'm sure that everyone would stop drinking. Right?

[Spazzmaticus]

We should ban alcohol while we are at it. Would stop all the drunk driving. I'm sure that everyone would stop drinking. Right?

The Prohibition era does leave you with a bad taste in your mouth. However, In this case what you are implying is pretty much a case of false equivalence, apples and oranges. There was an article in the Times showing that stricter gun laws have in fact reduced the homocide rates quite drastically in the nations where they are implemented, whereas Prohibition was a resounding failure.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/18/opini ... .html?_r=1

That doesn't necessarily mean that similar effects would be seen in the case of the United States but I hardly see why they wouldn't.

[Leō]

Do you know what he said was sarcastic Spazz?

[Spazzmaticus]

Do you know what he said was sarcastic Spazz?

As in, he implied that stricter gun laws would fail, comparing it to the prohibition of alcohol? Or did I miss something? Seems like it would be a rather pointless statement otherwise.