er-queent8r wrote:DeepSixed wrote:JohnCarver wrote:Statues were in Day one.
We have a fairly healthy list of things we could have done better on for the expeditions. Next one will hopefully be better. If we release an expedition we are VERY proud of, without the speed bumps and hiccups that we experienced, and still get overwhelmingly rejected by the community on it then perhaps we will reconsider. Until then we are trying to focus more on how to make the next one better. I agree that most of the issue was trying to cater to a crowd without giving that crowd the tolls they needed to compete with each other (see Judaism suggestions).
As for ending it. I play 90% on Popham and 10% on Providence. So no, I see no reason to trash my base because you guys would prefer to make forum posts instead of going out there and winning it.
I also think I have mentioned we have a 'schedule' to make it easier and easier to end the server. I still stand that anything under 3 months is a failure and anything over a year is a failure. I consider everything in between generally acceptable for expedition duration.
Didn't your own Mod say this one was almost a year old.
Who has the exact date...when Popham will roll over 12 months?
I logged into Popham on the last Crash this past Saturday and considering what's left to complete with the 'Ark'... screenshot added to public view' ... pilgrim-wise Popham is a Certain Failure of Epic proportions.
Cheers
TH∄R∄ ᴉS ⃣ NLY ⃣ N∄ FAᴉLUR∄ PLAYᴉNG THᴉS GAM∄.....Y ⃣ U
The only failure I see is yours er-Queen8tr... you who've been here through it all; not the occasional players. You have a witch- I recall reading about the 'channel or dual purpose ability to swap between pilgrim and witch you a liked. It's folks like you who have failed the server or deliberately been dormant when it mattered.
Don't ***** it me b/c I wasn't around to hold your hand.
What a waste of time and space you are.
