![Trollface ¦]](./images/smilies/troll.gif)

Spazzmaticus wrote: Still not worth the effort, though.
TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
colesie wrote:Mereni wrote:I wouldn't have a problem with the buttons if the results were more understandable. Supposedly, for every 3 choices, one is neutral, one is + and one is -. But when I click on a choice, the avatar often doesn't do anything to indicate a + or - reaction. I'm forced to assume that it sometimes indicates the reaction and sometimes doesn't...randomly? It makes for a very frustrating and nearly impossible minigame since not only can you not tell when you're doing it right, you have no idea which fish is on the line so it's basically always a guess.
But it does show you..?
You lean forwards for a bad result, and back for a good one. You stay the same for neutral. If you go too far forward, you lose it. If you go all the way back, it's caught.
Idk about you, but I've actually fished and speaking on it without fishing will only be terrible and everyone could die so you should probably go fish and come back and edit your post since you likely haven't done it in a very long time. But since I fish, idk why I'm even explaining this to you since others will then be able to fish too.
10 points to whoever finds the post I'm referencing here ^
FutureForJames wrote:It is because some choices are not strong enough to get you to a higher/lower level all the time. There are weak negative and weak positive actions. Do serveral weak negatives and you'll see a lower level being reached.
Mereni wrote:colesie wrote:Mereni wrote:I wouldn't have a problem with the buttons if the results were more understandable. Supposedly, for every 3 choices, one is neutral, one is + and one is -. But when I click on a choice, the avatar often doesn't do anything to indicate a + or - reaction. I'm forced to assume that it sometimes indicates the reaction and sometimes doesn't...randomly? It makes for a very frustrating and nearly impossible minigame since not only can you not tell when you're doing it right, you have no idea which fish is on the line so it's basically always a guess.
But it does show you..?
You lean forwards for a bad result, and back for a good one. You stay the same for neutral. If you go too far forward, you lose it. If you go all the way back, it's caught.
Idk about you, but I've actually fished and speaking on it without fishing will only be terrible and everyone could die so you should probably go fish and come back and edit your post since you likely haven't done it in a very long time. But since I fish, idk why I'm even explaining this to you since others will then be able to fish too.
10 points to whoever finds the post I'm referencing here ^
Wow, can't handle being wrong?
TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
Dallane wrote:Coles after being proven wrong followed by swift bans
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests