jorb wrote:what edifices of behaviors or morality you believe progressives tore down and deconstructed
I find the public expressions of modernity to be shallow, vain, stale, technocratic, petty, animalistic, lonely, ugly, egotistic, spiritually lacking and devoid of meaning, and feel instead far more comfortable in what I perceive to be the vertically oriented, familial, richer, fuller, and more integrated world view and symbolism of what can broadly be described as the old order, that is to say traditional, Christian and Monarchical European societies as they appeared -- rooted in the soil of their making -- before the murderous ravages of the 20th century. When I lament Jacobin deconstruction, it is precisely the deconstruction of traditional, legitimate authority and natural order I lament, i.e. the systematic subversion of symbols such as those of -- most visibly -- throne and altar, and their replacement instead with the symbols of money and the guillotine, that is to say corporate neo-mercantilism and democracy.(1)
I do not believe in democracy, nor in human equality before any yardstick other than God.(2) The forms, concepts, expressions and internal contradictions of liberal secular religion and theology are not mine, and I take no interest in them. I consider beauty to be an objective category, and a human value of no lesser an importance than that of truth or justice.
I believe that God in his image made men and women separate and distinct. I recognize the fundamental distinctness of archetypes such as 'Mother' and 'Father', and I do not believe that human life or understanding is served by reducing such wondrous categories of structured reality to an undifferentiated muddle of indistinct chaos, i.e. "equality". It follows that I feel no particular compulsion to treat men and women "equally", but on the contrary always with respect for the fullness and integrity of their persons.(3)
I consider any assertion of equality as a value to be incompatible with the recognition of human personhood and personality; the fundamental, manifold expressions of harmonious -- that is to say differentiated and fundamentally unequal -- reality, and the most beautiful qualities of the human condition.(4)
I believe it virtuous to put kith and kin before strangers.
I do not consider fornication to be the apex of human personal achievement. (5)
This makes perfect sense to me:
This does not:(6)
I am of course well aware that the Fall from Grace is of a far older date than the 20th century, and I entertain no Utopian illusions about any actualized earthly perfection at any time since.(7)
I believe in love, humility, grace, mercy, humor and forgiveness, and in meeting my fellow men in the most Christian spirit I can possibly muster. (8)
The Lord knows I struggle at times.
-----------------------------
It is precisely this the very understanding of virtue that has been deconstructed and torn down.
All flesh is hay.
This is very interesting, and unique that a game developer divulges his personal beliefs. I have some follow up questions and comments:
1. You want to go back to the time where there was one ruling figure on the top whom you think actually ruled everything? The man or men (and sometime women) on top could be inbred retards. (Ok, sometimes this happens in modernity, but someone actually voted for them.) In a world where there was almost no "diffusion" between the classes. Where your occupation was decided by the occupation of your father? Where the rulers started wars on a whim? (Ok bad example.)
Peasants could not choose to leave "their" land because they and their progeny were bound to it for all generations to come.
2. There is no equality of men until death. The institutionalized God is a construct to get the slaves to bend their knees. At least a institutionalized God in whom you seem to refer to. A personal belief based on ones own experience with the world I have no problems with understanding, but when it comes to a priesthood or any other form of governing entity that decides right from wrong I get problems both logical and ethical.
3. Yeah the sexes are different..
4. Yeah human indidviduals are all different, even monozygotic twins.
5. Obviously.
6. We share this opinion.
7. Was the fall from grace when Eve tricked Adam?
8.What is your definition of the christian spirit? I know about many things that have been in the Lords name that Jesus himself might not approve wholeheartedly of.