[POLL] Do you want to play on a new server?

[Wournos]

I really dont understand why they didn't wipe. newer ppl will NEVER catch up to us who have been playing for awhile and us who have stores upon stores of seeds and food.

Because if they did, it would take weeks to get any reasonable testing done simply because everyone would have to start fresh. I know, it's not an ideal situation but it is better this way from a testing perspective.

I voted yes for new server(s). But ONLY after the whole concept of purity is more stable.

[colesie]

I really dont understand why they didn't wipe. newer ppl will NEVER catch up to us who have been playing for awhile and us who have stores upon stores of seeds and food.

Because if they did, it would take weeks to get any reasonable testing done simply because everyone would have to start fresh. I know, it's not an ideal situation but it is better this way from a testing perspective.

I voted yes for new server(s). But ONLY after the whole concept of purity is more stable.

Actually, it's more a thing with paradox than anything. If this were haven, there would have been a wipe around this time. The dev just aren't sure how paradox would take to wipes really. I suggested the idea of making a new "Test" server that would have the message from the very start that it would be eventually wiped. This seems more likely than a full wipe at the moment.

[staxjax]

In response to all the butthurt in the latest update, I will bump this thread for those that havent voted or would like to change their vote.

[colesie]

Ply had 27 players on last night, and that was around update time too. Haven had never went below 30 in my time of checking during the lag-fest which lasted 6+ months. Wipe please.

[Procne]

I don't think low numbers are caused by lack of wipe.
Low numbers on Plymouth are caused by indians first, and by updates in progress second.
If you wipe Plymouth now then it won't remove any of the above reasons

[Khaztropix]

I don't think low numbers are caused by lack of wipe.
Low numbers on Plymouth are caused by indians first, and by updates in progress second.
If you wipe Plymouth now then it won't remove any of the above reasons

Plymouth had a healthy population and seemed to be growing after the open beta announcement. The population died when the purity/alchemy changes were released.

[Claeyt]

Ply had 27 players on last night, and that was around update time too. Haven had never went below 30 in my time of checking during the lag-fest which lasted 6+ months. Wipe please.

It was the day before the update.

No wipe needed. Just fix it.

[colesie]

Ply had 27 players on last night, and that was around update time too. Haven had never went below 30 in my time of checking during the lag-fest which lasted 6+ months. Wipe please.

It was the day before the update.

No wipe needed. Just fix it.

Plymouth

State Up
Users 38
Load 5%

[Dallane]

Ply had 27 players on last night, and that was around update time too. Haven had never went below 30 in my time of checking during the lag-fest which lasted 6+ months. Wipe please.

It was the day before the update.

No wipe needed. Just fix it.

Plymouth

State Up
Users 38
Load 5%

There are 263 hearthlings playing.

[Claeyt]

Choose? They have already chosen since they don't work on hnh other then making that 1 one lag fix

and

It hasn't been updated in over a year. Lag was fixed but aside from that the game is sitting idle.

154 total players over here, but at least Salem has a future. You guys are still playing a game that has peaked.