Page 1 of 2
Apologizing
Posted:
Sat Oct 11, 2014 9:01 pmby Heffernan
Hello His/her/it Majesty
id like to Apologize for insulting the name of our Majesty and request to get mah low taxes back
Kind Regards.
Re: Apologizing
Posted:
Sat Oct 11, 2014 9:04 pmby JohnCarver
I just spoke with his Majesty. He accepts your apology and will be reducing your stall back to the very fair, and overly generously 35% tax rate.
Re: Apologizing
Posted:
Sat Oct 11, 2014 9:07 pmby Heffernan
JohnCarver wrote:overly generously 35% tax rate.
![¦]](./images/smilies/troll.gif "Trollface")
Re: Apologizing
Posted:
Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:00 amby Sephorin
Seriously, you're a good sport, Heffernan. Thumbs up.
Re: Apologizing
Posted:
Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:49 amby Michael
I feel like I missed something that happened in-game? Anyone care to explain the details of why this is a thread that exists?
btw, I too think His Majesty is a little *****. Why do you keep spamming Boston with mean remarks about his majesty though? you must really hate him!
Re: Apologizing
Posted:
Sun Oct 12, 2014 4:27 amby trungdle
Michael wrote:I feel like I missed something that happened in-game? Anyone care to explain the details of why this is a thread that exists?
btw, I too think His Majesty is a little *****. Why do you keep spamming Boston with mean remarks about his majesty though? you must really hate him!
JohnCarver wrote:Heffernan wrote:
yet the dev doesnt care right? implement broken stall system with rediculous taxes and blame the players.
His Majesty has raised the tax on YOUR stall alone to 50%. In can be lowered to the very gracious and generous 35% again Pending your apology.
http://forum.salemthegame.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=11048&start=30
Re: Apologizing
Posted:
Thu Oct 16, 2014 7:03 pmby alagar
Michael wrote:I feel like I missed something that happened in-game? Anyone care to explain the details of why this is a thread that exists?
btw, I too think His Majesty is a little *****. Why do you keep spamming Boston with mean remarks about his majesty though? you must really hate him!
Just jc and his authoritarian and troll personality bullying salem players.
Re: Apologizing
Posted:
Thu Oct 16, 2014 7:32 pmby Nictos
alagar wrote:Michael wrote:I feel like I missed something that happened in-game? Anyone care to explain the details of why this is a thread that exists?
btw, I too think His Majesty is a little *****. Why do you keep spamming Boston with mean remarks about his majesty though? you must really hate him!
Just jc and his authoritarian and troll personality bullying salem players.
He has every right to. You're not the one spending every waking moment of your life trying to make this game a better place for everyone. If he wants to be human like the rest of us, let him. He deserves it.
Re: Apologizing
Posted:
Thu Oct 16, 2014 8:04 pmby lachlaan
There are worse things to be punished on this forum than a player being overly passionate about his opinion, in some cases, or a lot worse behaviours than a player that (as per the game's desires) has no clue how the game mechanics work. Let's be honest, the basic client giving as little info as possible doesn't exactly help a player to comprehend mechanics for him to be as well informed as JC would like so that a dunce hat may be avoided. Similarly, in a moment in development when our feedback is supposedly necessary, not being able to call a dev out on something you feel they're doing wrong would basically sum up to us not being needed at all for testing. I'd like to see duncehatting be less erratic and up-front and personal. Perhaps some players lose their ability to hunt a particular tier of wildlife due to their lack of hat slots, thus putting them at a disadvantage ingame, all because one of the grand wizards feels like it at the moment.
[/minirant]
Re: Apologizing
Posted:
Thu Oct 16, 2014 8:10 pmby Nictos
lachlaan wrote:There are worse things to be punished on this forum than a player being overly passionate about his opinion, in some cases, or a lot worse behaviours than a player that (as per the game's desires) has no clue how the game mechanics work. Let's be honest, the basic client giving as little info as possible doesn't exactly help a player to comprehend mechanics for him to be as well informed as JC would like so that a dunce hat may be avoided. Similarly, in a moment in development when our feedback is supposedly necessary, not being able to call a dev out on something you feel they're doing wrong would basically sum up to us not being needed at all for testing. I'd like to see duncehatting be less erratic and up-front and personal. Perhaps some players lose their ability to hunt a particular tier of wildlife due to their lack of hat slots, thus putting them at a disadvantage ingame, all because one of the grand wizards feels like it at the moment.
[/minirant]
There's a difference between a well constructive opinion than just a plain lash out, you know? I think it's okay for players to say they don't like something and can give good reasons why (like you just did) than saying something alone the lines of what was said previously. There was no criticism, just cynicism.