Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Forum for In-Game politics, relations, matters of justice, and other in-game topics.

Re: Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Postby JinxDevona » Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:22 am

summertime wrote:
same ip means same household at least... the chances that two people in same household play salem is low

We are a gaming family with three teen gamers and two parent gamers. There was a time when 3 of us played H&H and 2 of us played Salem. I know many people here play with their girlfriend/boyfriend or spouses in the same house. Not as low a chance as you might think.
Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. ~Margaret Thatcher
User avatar
JinxDevona
 
Posts: 668
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2012 7:21 pm

Re: Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Postby Propulsion » Sat Nov 01, 2014 3:08 am

A few different people in my house also play. I always let them know when it comes to sharing a cpu that i found the game first.
User avatar
Propulsion
 
Posts: 347
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 11:35 pm

Re: Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Postby DarkNacht » Sat Nov 01, 2014 5:48 am

I have known several people that play salem with their spouse, kids or roommate. Also it does not mean the same house hold not all ISPs give out unique IP addresses and in some places, like college dorms, a handful of IP addresses are shared between hundreds of people.
DarkNacht
 
Posts: 2684
Joined: Thu May 02, 2013 11:24 am

Re: Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Postby Mereni » Sat Nov 01, 2014 5:48 am

Off the top of my head, I recall three sets of treaty payers who played as families, and I didn't even deal with treaty payers; I only knew a handful of them.

Oh, and a set of four roommates who tried to join the tribe and lost interest.
User avatar
Mereni
 
Posts: 1839
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 8:26 am

Re: Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Postby Cheena » Sat Nov 01, 2014 1:02 pm

summertime wrote:punish plz those who voted for both but using different accounts (just compare ip)


And why exactly ? It was never specified that it was forbidden.
Trust your enemies more than your friends. Your enemies will never betray you.
loftar wrote:***** the treaty.

(Note: Citation is severely out of context.)
User avatar
Cheena
 
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 11:46 am
Location: Providence

Re: Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Postby summertime » Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:40 pm

Cheena wrote:
summertime wrote:punish plz those who voted for both but using different accounts (just compare ip)


And why exactly ? It was never specified that it was forbidden.


because of the opposite scenario: you reward people for having as many alternate accounts as possible, someone with 10 alt accounts could possibly get 10 times the reward of someone who uses 1 account... does this seem like a good reward system?
summertime
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:31 pm

Re: Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Postby grapefruitv » Sat Nov 01, 2014 3:11 pm

summertime wrote:because of the opposite scenario: you reward people for having as many alternate accounts as possible, someone with 10 alt accounts could possibly get 10 times the reward of someone who uses 1 account... does this seem like a good reward system?

The point is you can't punish people for something that was not forbidden in the first place, not that it is a perfect system. Whole Salem has this alting flow and I'm not sure it can ever be fixed without major changes to basic mechanics, including permadeath.
User avatar
grapefruitv
 
Posts: 709
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:53 am

Re: Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Postby Cheena » Sat Nov 01, 2014 3:17 pm

I have a bit less than 10 accounts and I certainly don't intend to stop using them. I didn't use them to vote tho, but I actually used 3 characters to do so. 2 from the same account who voted no, and 1 from another account who voted yes.

Again I don't see why I would be punished for voting as it was requested ¦]
Trust your enemies more than your friends. Your enemies will never betray you.
loftar wrote:***** the treaty.

(Note: Citation is severely out of context.)
User avatar
Cheena
 
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 11:46 am
Location: Providence

Re: Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Postby Ellerillen » Sat Nov 01, 2014 4:43 pm

Don't understand how to vote. Where is "YES" and "NO" officials? Is it two guards and a which? Right clicking on them doing nothing. And right clicking on them with ballot card doing nothing too. I'm confused. O___O'
Ellerillen
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:48 pm

Re: Justice in Providence - The Case of Lizbeth Maudney

Postby lachlaan » Sat Nov 01, 2014 4:50 pm

I think voting's done now and the votes are being counted.
Exactly 6.022 x 10^23 worth of Lach molecules.
lachlaan
Customer
 
Posts: 2043
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:11 pm

PreviousNext

Return to House of Burgesses

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron