Salem

Dallane wrote:

sabinati wrote:look. i am the first to admit that i know exactly ***** all about how raiding works in salem, but during my time in playing it seems to me that it would cost you less bbile to scan the containers than it would to sit there and tank a brazier. if that is no longer the case, please enlighten me. consider me as a small child with little understand who hasn't played in months.

You get a charge for peaking and braziers fire on you for doing so.

ok but is the cost of peaking [sic] in all the containers less than the cost of tanking the goddamn brazier or what

sabinati wrote:ok but is the cost of peaking [sic] in all the containers less than the cost of tanking the goddamn brazier or what

braziers are doing the same amount of damage to you no matter what you are doing i'm fairly sure

right, so why ***** around trying to bash them when you could be looking for loot?

sabinati wrote:right, so why ***** around trying to bash them when you could be looking for loot?

because you will have to make multiple trips instead of 1

please keep in mind that i am a 4 year old child and have not played this game recently, and explain further.

The braziers can do up to 10bb damage every 3 seconds. If you bash the braziers down to half hp they will quit firing until repaired. Carrying containers is really slow and stealing from containers gives you a crime charge for each item. Carrying containers far enough from braziers to make them quit firing is a huge waste of bb and you'll be having to wait for debuff to drop to be able to regen quite frequently. If you are planning on spending any amount of time on a claim committing crimes, you get the most use out of your black bile if there are no braziers firing at you.

colesie wrote:

loftar wrote:

colesie wrote:A certain larper spammed 100 leantos onto our village claim not so long ago.

How did that happen, though? Did he make a claim and HS-spawn alts on there, or did he just build the leantos? In the former case, a village outsider shouldn't be able to pclaim over the village; and in the latter, isn't he as affected by the debuff from all dat vandalism?

The one section didn't have a claim yet so he dropped one, a massive one. We couldn't v claim over it because he could break the village symbols. He then spammed the same HS on the claim a hundred (give or take) times and filled the claim. We managed to declaim it and claim over with a v claim so that's all fine and dandy but the leantos remain. To destroy them would requite criminal acts and under your new system that would mean that we'd be left online for a long ass time.

If u declaimed his PC, you can PC the land by yourself. Destroying a Lean-To, even if its owned by someone isn´t a crime if its on your personal claim!

Never ever only VC a region. You always should claim double! The two types of claiming gives different power. Everybody can move through all your land if u only VC it, without a crime. They can walk right in position and start the crime where its most usefull.

FunForLife wrote:Never ever only VC a region. You always should claim double!

That is actually very wrong. With a PC and VC people can destroy your auth objects. VC or Claim never both.

Dallane wrote:That is actually very wrong. With a PC and VC people can destroy your auth objects. VC or Claim never both.

Can u please explain that in detail? What do u mean with "auth" objects?

Just to make sure, we are talking of the same: Only one guy claims all the land as PC and VC. Not a bench of claims!

FunForLife wrote:

Dallane wrote:That is actually very wrong. With a PC and VC people can destroy your auth objects. VC or Claim never both.

Can u please explain that in detail? What do u mean with "auth" objects?

the objects you use to expand your village