by KruskDaMangled » Fri Aug 14, 2015 4:15 pm
I was reading about it and I think that's only a consolation for your frustration, which was playing the animal lottery, and getting two ornery billy goats that together, were as useless as certain anatomical features on a bull. (Maybe worse than useless since being naturally inclined to do so, they made a game attempt to kill each other under the prevailing circumstances.)
I feel like we should be able to "buy the one we need", because you can certainly tell what it is after you buy it, why not before? If it was that "oh, this animal is useful and will grow into meat and hides and whatever regardless" lower (or probably raise! I know the devs) the cost of definitely getting the one you need, either a definitely male or female animal is more expensive, or whichever seems best to have as the more expensive one, in light of the added utility. Maybe the male could be cheaper because all he will do without the female (which you will have to get elsewhere, and probably right there with even more money) is eat your food and be a nuisance and eventually get slaughtered. (probably sooner rather than later if he doesn't die on his own anyway). I mean, the animal products are inherently valuable, I get that, as is the potential for breeding, but paying to play the lottery and getting screwed that often is frustrating. And it seems like common sense that you would be able to tell.
If it takes making it obnoxiously expensive or (hopefully) lowering the cost on the males and raising it some on the females to "balance" it, that would be fine.
Otherwise I don't disagree, something like that would be fun. We have models for the animals, just find someway to apply it to a furniture item you can put in your house so you can show off how you totally beat a Darkenbear.