edited out.
Can some mod delete this post for me.
jorb wrote:(jwhitehorn) you are an ungrateful, spoiled child
DarkNacht wrote:The bans on the Chief and Binks are appropriate, but Sabinati behavior is not, especially his reluctance to clarify when he is acting as a mod or just a member of the forums. Sabinati should not be a mod.
JohnCarver wrote:Mortal Moments Inc. is not here to cannibalize the community or piece out the code. We are not here because we wish to institute pay to win models or PvE servers. Quite the contrary.
Claeyt wrote:Ass_Kraken wrote:Doesn't premeditated trolling carry a higher sentence than bink's usual 0 thought trolling posts? I feel chief's ban should be extended for this reason.
Well, premeditated trolling is half the forum.![]()
Honestly, There's no excuse for trolling the bug reports, period. I was looking for information on a pretty serious bug, and Chief's comments were a troll attempt for no reason. I heard later that after he heard that Darwoth had actually performed the murder action bug kill on one of Binks's alts that Chief tested and actually replicated it then reported it to jorb, replicated it for jorb and somehow they got it Loftar. This was all for the good of the game. That being said, he shouldn't have then trolled me on my bug report so that both Kand and I reported him. What he should have written if he wanted to be a leader of this game and a master-mason for the development of this game is:
"I heard that Darwoth had actually performed the murder action bug kill on one of Binks's alts. I tested and replicated it then reported it and replicated for jorb. Loftar's working on it and it should be done soon."
My respect for him would have gone up 10 fold if he'd written that instead of his usual lame troll attempts on me. Maybe he doesn't want my respect but I would have thought of him more like a mason and top player working for the good of the game he loves.
As for the mods, they've been a lot better this fall but the whole GH history gets in the way sooo much. Old fights have to have an end don't they guys. I think 3 weeks is too much for calling someone a '*****'. Although it's up to Sabinati and not me, as one of the one's who reported Chief I'd say a week for Chief and 1 day for Binks would have been fair. I understand the history and understand that you're trying to get them and the forum under control (especially since we've grown a little bit this month with new players).
I'd at least ask Sabinati, with all due respect to have the other mods vote on his ban lengths and allow Binks and Chief to promise to never do what they did again to lessen their bans. Have them write it up in a PM and if they do it again, show it to them and throw the ban hammer harder. Mod mercy is a virtue also and it keeps the peace better.
Personally, If I was a mod, I'd probably never post on the HoB or CoaH forums again. Unless it was official.
Claeyt wrote:I think Sabinati should be a mod, but he just needs to tone it down a bit and not act like this is the HnH forum.
Professor Gu Zhongmao wrote:These projects are beautiful to scientists, but nightmarish to engineers
Jalpha wrote:I like how someone can constantly harass the mods both in-game and on the forums and people are incredulous when that person gets a slap in the face. If you don't give any respect I don't know how can you expect to receive it...
JohnCarver wrote:anybody who argues to remove a mechanic that allows "yet another" way to summon somebody is really a carebear in disguise trying to save his own hide.
MagicManICT wrote:Claeyt wrote:I got 2 PM's from certain unnamed jackasses showing money shots to the hair from this post. Kinda sick but somebody out there laughed.
If the mod team were to see a report on something like this, we would have to act on it. Just because a PM is sent doesn't mean the rules don't exist. Consider this a general public warning on the matter.
Translation: if you and your buddy want to send porn back and forth to each other, fine, as long as nobody complains. however, the rules do explicitly state to "keep it friendly and readable." Posting porn is explicitly mentioned, too. Sending unwanted photos to somebody is not friendly and would get a very stern action from me, at least. (I wouldn't hesitate at making it a permaban to start and then working back from there after discussing it with other mods and jorb.)
JohnCarver wrote:anybody who argues to remove a mechanic that allows "yet another" way to summon somebody is really a carebear in disguise trying to save his own hide.
MagicManICT wrote:Reposting from viewtopic.php?f=3&t=7651&start=160#p99190 for better visibility. Seems that a clear reminder that personal messages still follow forum rules needs to be given.MagicManICT wrote:Claeyt wrote:I got 2 PM's from certain unnamed jackasses showing money shots to the hair from this post. Kinda sick but somebody out there laughed.
If the mod team were to see a report on something like this, we would have to act on it. Just because a PM is sent doesn't mean the rules don't exist. Consider this a general public warning on the matter.
Translation: if you and your buddy want to send porn back and forth to each other, fine, as long as nobody complains. however, the rules do explicitly state to "keep it friendly and readable." Posting porn is explicitly mentioned, too. Sending unwanted photos to somebody is not friendly and would get a very stern action from me, at least. (I wouldn't hesitate at making it a permaban to start and then working back from there after discussing it with other mods and jorb.)
jorb wrote:(jwhitehorn) you are an ungrateful, spoiled child
JohnCarver wrote:anybody who argues to remove a mechanic that allows "yet another" way to summon somebody is really a carebear in disguise trying to save his own hide.
Rydersowl wrote:I didn't read that as a troll attempt. That was him telling you to stop being an idiot as he felt inclined to do. The video he suggested would never happen with his implication that you could not refrain from making uninformed comments.
There are plenty of other mods who have been objective in this exact situation. Once again, I'd love for them to comment on this. That means not Sab. Not Jordan Coles. Not Potjeh. Not playing the forum game that much those are the three who clearly have a bias towards this whole charade.
colesie wrote:Claeyt wrote:I think Sabinati should be a mod, but he just needs to tone it down a bit and not act like this is the HnH forum.
The only thing that was keeping the forums from being the same as the haven forums was Paradox and they've since jumped ship. These are the haven forums in a lot of ways, the shift in moderation is still getting used to but if you want to speed up the acceptance I suggest you read the haven forums.
Jalpha wrote:I haven't had a problem with the mods, even when I've been moderated, because I don't behave like a child every time they do something I don't like.
jorb wrote:(jwhitehorn) you are an ungrateful, spoiled child
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests