TL;DR: The Thread

[Dallane]

Don't worry murica is watching everyone now lol

don't flatter yourself. Murica is also ignoring you

Don't you worry. Dallane gonna be just fine.

I was talking about the latest news with american intel

You really shouldn't let your feelings control your posting. You will just look stupid.

[Nimmeth]

ps: my wife is a hard worker, i'm a stay at home dad who grows & sells drugs & games all day equality does not exist & ***** yeah, freedom of speech, muricah sux !

Hehe, sounds like you have a good time there, i don't give a ***** what people think i should do, but i like to work for the money and paying tax,
i don't envy or dislike people that don't work or break the law getting some extra money in some way or another, i put my trust into the government to set out rules to adjust and correct stuff, and ensure stability
also quite lucky there is next to none corrupt politician in my country unlike other countries.

http://www.worldaudit.org/corruption.htm

[colesie]

Just so we don't forget what the 2 Dev's and Admins of this forum have said here and on other forums over the past 3 months.

Jorb / Loftar Quotes

Who cares

[Claeyt]

Don't you worry. Dallane gonna be just fine.

Why are you talking about yourself in the 3rd person now?

Who cares

I do, but mostly it was for the new guy on this thread. As a mod you can always lock it, if you see it going nowhere.

Nope. I still think you don't want or cannot understand him. To address his first quoted post, to get a better view, I would've directly asked, "which particular measures/actions you want to employ on your future children?". Have I missed this question and his answer?

IMO this particular question and a honest answer are very important to any judgment.

I don't understand that question about my kids at all. What measures/actions are you talking about? Who do you think I don't understand? Procne, Jorb, Loftar? I've had many arguments about similar subjects with similar people. Their ideas need to be answered.

Also, I saw the following interpretation which was made in private, to quote it: "he wants the mother to sit by the stove at home, cooking the meals, obeying the father". It was based only on that one quote. It simplistically ignores his "but on the contrary [to treat] always with respect for the fullness and integrity of their persons".

It wasn't made in private, it was on a completely different thread. If you're talking about the Jorb thread. Who's post are you talking about?

In the same sentence he talks about inherent inequality. How it can be interpreted? Imagine two hyperbolic cases. In first case 2/3 of all men have died. In the second, 2/3 of all women. Will be outcome for a humanity, as a whole, equal in these two cases?

No, in the first case StaxJax and Jwhitehorn would finally get laid. In the second, we would have less kids for awhile. Both would be equally hard for the world in terms of compassion and the sorrow of family members lost.

[staxjax]

No, in the first case StaxJax and Jwhitehorn would finally get laid. In the second, we would have less kids for awhile. Both would be equally hard for the world in terms of compassion and the sorrow of family members lost.

I'm pretty sure we are both married, and the 18 children I have with my wife are a testament to the fact that I get laid entirely too often. My children will not require special assistance for being handicapped or ESL kids. They will all graduate from college, have their college paid for entirely by myself, and be hard working people that devote their lives to the betterment of themselves and their country. All of this talk about equal oppurtunity and equal outcome is a crock of ****, and has to do with more about hard work, perserverance, and raising your children with core values needed to be successful in life, and providing them with the tools to do so. I live in a place where 99% of the population lives entirely off of government assistance (foodstamps, ssi, medicaid, etc.), where they pay no taxes, and do not have to work, and somehow they manage to buy nice things...I would like you to take a wild guess as to what the children in these communities aspire to become when the grow up.

Absolutely ***** nothing, just like their parents.

[FutureForJames]

No, in the first case StaxJax and Jwhitehorn would finally get laid. In the second, we would have less kids for awhile. Both would be equally hard for the world in terms of compassion and the sorrow of family members lost.

I'm pretty sure we are both married, and the 18 children I have with my wife are a testament to the fact that I get laid entirely too often. My children will not require special assistance for being handicapped or ESL kids. They will all graduate from college, have their college paid for entirely by myself, and be hard working people that devote their lives to the betterment of themselves and their country. All of this talk about equal oppurtunity and equal outcome is a crock of ****, and has to do with more about hard work, perserverance, and raising your children with core values needed to be successful in life, and providing them with the tools to do so. I live in a place where 99% of the population lives entirely off of government assistance (foodstamps, ssi, medicaid, etc.), where they pay no taxes, and do not have to work, and somehow they manage to buy nice things...I would like you to take a wild guess as to what the children in these communities aspire to become when the grow up.

Absolutely ***** nothing, just like their parents.

Will one of those core values be to have sex in a responsible manner i.e. use a condom?

[staxjax]

No, it will be abstinence. Once they are married idgaf how many kids they have, tax credits are good for working people.

[FutureForJames]

No, it will be abstinence. Once they are married idgaf how many kids they have, tax credits are good for working people.

I.e. you will raise your boys to be beta males, got ya.

[marvi]

I don't understand that question about my kids at all. What measures/actions are you talking about? Who do you think I don't understand? Procne, Jorb, Loftar? I've had many arguments about similar subjects with similar people. Their ideas need to be answered.

It's a question to Jorb, not to you. If, in his views, best methods are "punishment" or "isolation", only then we can agree that "repulsive ***** cancer" is a right characterization.

It wasn't made in private, it was on a completely different thread. If you're talking about the Jorb thread. Who's post are you talking about?

I copy-pasted it from Skype conversation.

No, in the first case StaxJax and Jwhitehorn would finally get laid. In the second, we would have less kids for awhile. Both would be equally hard for the world in terms of compassion and the sorrow of family members lost.

I agree about compassion and the sorrow but that's not the point. Take your answer "No" and try to logically connect it with the Jorb's quote to challenge the "openness" of your mind. Do not forget "but on the contrary [to treat] always with respect for the fullness and integrity of their persons".

[Claeyt]

I agree about compassion and the sorrow but that's not the point. Take your answer "No" and try to logically connect it with the Jorb's quote to challenge the "openness" of your mind. Do not forget "but on the contrary [to treat] always with respect for the fullness and integrity of their persons".

Sorry had no way of knowing you were directing that post at Jorb.

Yes I have an open mind, and yes Jorb is not some raving lunatic like StaxJax and his 18 kids (now we know why Stax is like he is ), and I can respect some of his beliefs. Unfortunately much of what he says doesn't help me to respect his other ideas.