Moderation Complaints Megathread v.2.0

[TeckXKnight]

so what you're saying (i'm not into quoting lines from people)
is that clouddog's picture was more relavant than my words*?

Yes.

And not quoting is fine. Would you prefer if I did not either? It's sort of a habit but I can avoid it for this conversation if it's impolite.

[Nimmeth]

so what you're saying (i'm not into quoting lines from people)
is that clouddog's picture was more relavant than my words*?

Yes.

How can you justify that?

[NeiroShop]

so what you're saying (i'm not into quoting lines from people)
is that clouddog's picture was more relavant than my words*?

Would you feel better if they removed all other posts that had no relevance nor added anything to the thread. As there would be exactly 2 posts then. Chill soon enough colesie will go raging over some chief posts then you can complain til then relax.

[TeckXKnight]

How can you justify that?

Clouddog was attacking the credibility and value of Danotasi. A known rival of the tribe, Clouddog would be anticipated to be in opposition to matters of justice conducted by the tribe for political reasons. This kind of post provokes a credible response, and often an angry one. In this case it got Chief to post pics and details, which are great things.

[Nimmeth]

Clouddog was attacking the credibility and value of Danotasi. A known rival of the tribe, Clouddog would be anticipated to be in opposition to matters of justice conducted by the tribe for political reasons. This kind of post provokes a credible response, and often an angry one. In this case it got Chief to post pics and details, which are great things.

i don't want to be rude, so i'll just let it stop here. but thanks for proving my original point teck, not sure you wanted to do it, but you just did it

[NeiroShop]

Clouddog was attacking the credibility and value of Danotasi. A known rival of the tribe, Clouddog would be anticipated to be in opposition to matters of justice conducted by the tribe for political reasons. This kind of post provokes a credible response, and often an angry one. In this case it got Chief to post pics and details, which are great things.

I found this to be a rather funny response Here is a prime example of personal judgement which can not and never will be impartial. Which is why we have this whole thread in the 1st place.

You can probably see how someone could argue for nimmeth's post the same way you argued for Clouddogs.

However as we are not ruled by paradox etc please consider only stepping in once profanities,insults (severe) and or asked to clean up a thread instead of just removing posts and spend a whole lot of time arguing why you did something. Tbh the community is so small nowadays anyway.

[TeckXKnight]

There were multiple reports about derailing for that thread. A total of 4 reports on the subject from 3 different people.

[NeiroShop]

There were multiple reports about derailing for that thread. A total of 4 reports on the subject from 3 different people.

Oh i wasnt really talking bout that specific thread I have no issues with the removing of derails at all. I probably woulda only left two or 3posts myself. Glad to know people actually use report function now and then. (Cough i dont)

[Dallane]

There were multiple reports about derailing for that thread. A total of 4 reports on the subject from 3 different people.

Oh i wasnt really talking bout that specific thread I have no issues with the removing of derails at all. I probably woulda only left two or 3posts myself. Glad to know people actually use report function now and then. (Cough i dont)

They use that all the time how else would you get the eyes of moderation in a thread?

[sabinati]

Glad to know people actually use report function now and then. (Cough i dont)

you really don't have room to complain then, do you?