dageir wrote:If the Taliban is the strongest faction, they will dominate. What we think about that is irrelevant as long as we are not willing to pay the price to remove them. If Russia and USA (and maybe China and even India) agreed on cooperating in this and not try to screw eachother up while not being overly humane, Afghanistan might be "solved". But as usual if one great power sees another trying to intervene somewhere you an be sure others support "insurgents". The tribal system in Afghanistan makes it more vulnerable to influences like Taliban since such an arrangement in it self counters a centralized government. Afghanistan wil be in a state of civil war until the Taliban takes charge. As much as I disagree with everything Taliban stands for, they might represent the stability needed to form an actual centralized govenment, dismantling the tribal system. This in turn might prepare the ground for reforms and revolutions on the basis of an actual functioning state. Its a long haul, but its the only realistic one.
belgear wrote:A Russian stole some lime out of the barrel I was using
Jalpha wrote:I knew a Russian, he seemed like an alright guy. Then I ran into this other Russian who was a complete ******* and caused me some troubles, for which he paid with his life.
That Russian I thought was alright? Turns out he's an ******* too.
Not saying all Russians are evil but they stick together, even when one of them is a total immature *****. For this reason, and because so many Russians are immature ***** in this game I don't trust Russians. It's not at the point where I'd pick a fight, but damn it's getting close. All the Russians I have known long enough have shown absolutely zero respect for other people who aren't Russian eventually.
No respect for me, no respect for you. It's a simple equation.
thl111 wrote:Do what the british did, build outposts on Afghan frontier and let them fight each other. I don't see the importance of that god forsaken land.
kulbek wrote:In fact a lot of Russians don't drink alcoholic beverages.
kulbek wrote:In fact, the war in Afghanistan was not aggressive, but we wanted to bring them communism, freedom. But given that we have abandoned the Communist ideology(perestroika began in 1987), and the meaning of the war was lost. That's why we brought the troops.
What kind of Jackass statement is that? Yes, St. Petersburg was the "Capitol" and seat of the monarchy, but Moscow was by far the largest city. Why the hell would Napoleon have attacked the partially built swamp of St. Petersburg while the Russian army was in front of him at Moscow.kulbek wrote:Claeyt wrote:. And of course you may have helped to capture Paris, but Napoleon did take Moscow.
Moscow was not the capital of the Russian Empire. Paris was the capital of France
Yes actually there were many victories of the Muslims over the Russians and Orthodox armies of Eastern Europe.kulbek wrote:And a lot was the victories of the Turkish and Muslim armies over Russian?! Also I would like to note that the Russian army will always been a multiethnic and multi-confessional.
Yes, Chechnya, Dagestan and the other war zones created by the Russian military and Putin have led to many refugees, some of them have even fled the Russian Army and moved to the US unfortunately. The population of Russia would still be shrinking without them.kulbek wrote:In fact the number is growing in Russia at the expense of refugees from neighbouring countries.
jorb wrote:(jwhitehorn) you are an ungrateful, spoiled child
thl111 wrote:One other thing I have to ask, how in the devil's name can Putin and Medvedev take turns being President and PM? Are they planning to dissolve the Duma any time soon?
jorb wrote:(jwhitehorn) you are an ungrateful, spoiled child
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests