MM Tribe Treaty

Forum for In-Game politics, relations and matters of justice.

Re: MM Tribe Treaty

Postby Ikpeip » Tue May 07, 2013 12:58 am

excelinor wrote:One of the enforcers visited my homestead today.
While talking he seemed like a nice guy (Dangerous Dan or something was his name). I also liked the whole Roleplaying approach.
What I didn't like was the "show of force" - he's broken several containers with stuff I worked hard to collect.
This might seem as a silly matter for veteran players but it's not for those who only started recently.
What I want to say - why not change your approach? Leave a message board instead of destroying stuff.
I asked him to slay me in the end. Paying the money is nothing, the protection it offers is actually good to have - I would've agreed to the treaty without hesitation.
It's the attitude that's the problem.


Good evening,

Lester Garro, correct?

I may have left a signpost under other conditions - however, I was on my way to handle another matter, and came across your claim in transit, without materials for a signpost.

I wish you luck on your next go-around. Based on the productivity evident in your claim site, and how you've taken your loss in stride, I'm sure you'll do fine. If you decide to return to Plymouth, do let me know. I do have three bits of advice for you, going forward:

-Don't build a townhouse before you have walls and some braziers. A townhouse is a sign of wealth, and attracts raiders. A townhouse without walls or braziers is hard to pass up.
-Don't have full permissions (trespassing/larceny/vandalism) granted on your white-color kins. When you were KO'd and kinned Dangerous Dan, at that point I was free to poke around your claim with impunity. Set the full permissions to another color, and only code kin with that color selectively.
-Don't get riled up by the trolls on these forums. Anyone with more than a few hundred posts should probably be ignored. Accusations of a new poster being a sockpuppet is their standard response to drive newcomers away.

Faithfully,

-Paul the Paymaster (a.k.a. Dangerous Dan Dabrowski)
User avatar
Ikpeip
 
Posts: 807
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:02 pm

Re: MM Tribe Treaty

Postby excelinor » Tue May 07, 2013 12:39 pm

Nimmeth,
please, forgive me for the misunderstanding :)

Ikpeip,
thank you for the advice, I'll be sure to use it!
one question though - how did you summon me when I haven't committed any crimes? When I logged in I was already flat on the ground.
excelinor
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:03 pm

Re: MM Tribe Treaty

Postby Ikpeip » Tue May 07, 2013 4:12 pm

excelinor wrote:Ikpeip,
thank you for the advice, I'll be sure to use it!
one question though - how did you summon me when I haven't committed any crimes? When I logged in I was already flat on the ground.


Good morning,

I didn't summon you - you were very, very unlucky and logged in right next to where I was standing, and I was able to lay you out before your screen had loaded.

Faithfully,

-Paul the Paymaster/Dangerous Dan Dabrowski
User avatar
Ikpeip
 
Posts: 807
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:02 pm

Re: MM Tribe Treaty

Postby jwhitehorn » Fri May 17, 2013 9:30 am

Attention Squatters.
Tree Walls cannot protect you from delinquent Treaty Payments.

Image

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe
Admin for Salem Wiki • Make suggestions or complaints in the Wiki Suggestion thread
User avatar
jwhitehorn
 
Posts: 5307
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: MM Tribe Treaty

Postby McGovern » Fri May 17, 2013 3:11 pm

So much for natives not beliving in the concept of land ownership. :roll:
McGovern
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:47 pm

Re: MM Tribe Treaty

Postby Lusewing » Fri May 17, 2013 3:35 pm

McGovern wrote:So much for natives not beliving in the concept of land ownership. :roll:


I guess this is what happens when we push our own beliefs on others.
Do not argue with idiots, for they will pull you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
User avatar
Lusewing
 
Posts: 1218
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:34 pm

Re: MM Tribe Treaty

Postby MagicManICT » Fri May 17, 2013 3:47 pm

Lusewing wrote:
McGovern wrote:So much for natives not beliving in the concept of land ownership. :roll:


I guess this is what happens when we push our own beliefs on others.


The question is then: who's pushing what belief on to whom?
I am a moderator. I moderate stuff. When I do, I write in this color.
JohnCarver wrote:anybody who argues to remove a mechanic that allows "yet another" way to summon somebody is really a carebear in disguise trying to save his own hide.
MagicManICT
 
Posts: 5088
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:46 am

Re: MM Tribe Treaty

Postby Dallane » Fri May 17, 2013 3:58 pm

seem to have a few witnesses alive there.......
Please click this link for a better salem forum experience

TotalyMeow wrote: Claeyt's perspective of Salem and what it's about is very different from the devs and in many cases is completely the opposite of what we believe.
User avatar
Dallane
Moderator
 
Posts: 15195
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 2:00 pm

Re: MM Tribe Treaty

Postby McGovern » Fri May 17, 2013 4:05 pm

MagicManICT wrote:
Lusewing wrote:
McGovern wrote:So much for natives not beliving in the concept of land ownership. :roll:


I guess this is what happens when we push our own beliefs on others.


The question is then: who's pushing what belief on to whom?



I think we can all see who's pushing the weak around here.
McGovern
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:47 pm

Re: MM Tribe Treaty

Postby Droj » Fri May 17, 2013 4:09 pm

I have a theory; people would rather quit than (continue to) pay the treaty.
***** the Treaty!
loftar wrote:I not like, you not get
User avatar
Droj
 
Posts: 1192
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:23 am
Location: England

PreviousNext

Return to House of Burgesses

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests