Gallient wrote:So his arguments are in fact NOT in the treaty thread. Thank you.
They are now
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=3163&p=75439#p75439
Gallient wrote:So his arguments are in fact NOT in the treaty thread. Thank you.
colesie wrote:They are now
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=3163&p=75439#p75439
colsie wrote:gallient wrote:If you want to make the same argument as a hundred other individuals at the very least find the appropriate thread with the conversation you're interested in.
This is a thread about the treaty and everything that goes along with it. His arguments are in the proper place
colesie wrote:You do not seem to understand how links work
Gallient wrote:colesie wrote:You do not seem to understand how links work
They can link to other threads not MM Tribe Treaty?
darnokpl wrote:But does waste-claims can overlap each other?
darnokpl wrote:But does waste-claims can overlap each other?
MaoZeDong wrote:Hours pass and still the primary representative of the tribe hasn't issued a formal and mature response to any of the claims made about him and his tribe while at the same time its members continue to try to insult me and appeal to have my posts deleted entirely. Is this how the tribe responds to criticism, by trying to censor critical remarks and attacking the critics?!
-Vision quest complete
Faithfully yours, Mao "Puppy blood is delicious" Ze ****.
Nimmeth wrote:
yawn....
next!
Nimmeth wrote:I play on Roanoke
darnokpl wrote:But does waste-claims can overlap each other?
MaoZeDong wrote:
This proves my point that the tribe uses treaty payers to fight their political battles.
This is a crime that cannot go ignored!
MaoZeDong wrote:Hours pass and still the primary representative of the tribe hasn't issued a formal and mature response
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests