MM Tribe Treaty

[Gallient]

If your opponent isn't there to challenge you in any way, indirectly or not, what is it if it isn't a victory?

Exasperation.

If you want to make the same argument as a hundred other individuals at the very least find the appropriate thread with the conversation you're interested in. Then maybe try to add something to it instead of repeating the same generic mantras that have already received a response.

[colesie]

If your opponent isn't there to challenge you in any way, indirectly or not, what is it if it isn't a victory?

Exasperation.

If you want to make the same argument as a hundred other individuals at the very least find the appropriate thread with the conversation you're interested in. Then maybe try to add something to it instead of repeating the same generic mantras that have already received a response.

This is a thread about the treaty and everything that goes along with it. His arguments are in the proper place. Your argument is prettymuch as he posted though, "ur dumb, stahp"

[MaoZeDong]

If your opponent isn't there to challenge you in any way, indirectly or not, what is it if it isn't a victory?

Exasperation.

If you want to make the same argument as a hundred other individuals at the very least find the appropriate thread with the conversation you're interested in. Then maybe try to add something to it instead of repeating the same generic mantras that have already received a response.

I'm sorry, you seem to be confusing me responding to your post for my argument. My arguments are over here Mr. Brave sir.

-Vision quest complete
Faithfully yours, Mao "Puppy blood is delicious" Ze ****.

[Gallient]

This is a thread about the treaty and everything that goes along with it. His arguments are in the proper place. Your argument is prettymuch as he posted though, "ur dumb, stahp"

I never had an argument just an observation, and I already admitted it to being an ad hominem in the original post. You do realize his argument here is "The Chief shouldn't post" then, when the for the first time ever, Chief gives him the time of day he goes to link stuff in other threads that are not the MM Tribe Treaty. I mean really JC? You're a mod, you should be able to do better than this. If you want to go ahead and move all his posts to this thread then do so, but lets not pretend they already are.

[MaoZeDong]

You do realize his argument here is "The Chief shouldn't post"

Nope. My arguments are over here Mr. Brave sir.

-Vision quest complete
Faithfully yours, Mao "Puppy blood is delicious" Ze ****.

[colesie]

You do realize his argument here is "The Chief shouldn't post" then

That is not his argument

[Gallient]

You do realize his argument here is "The Chief shouldn't post" then

That is not his argument

What was it then? That the Chief doesn't bother with him so he wins? Please JC if you are going to go with "This is a thread about the treaty and everything that goes along with it. His arguments are in the proper place." Show me what his original "argument" is and how its in its proper place. If he doesn't want the Chief to post or JUST wants the Chief to reply to all responses I would say that's more a personal PM thing. Nothing to do with the treaty.

[MaoZeDong]

What was it then?

My arguments are over here Mister Brave sir.

Nothing to do with the treaty.

Ah, but it has everything to do with the Chief and the treaty. The Chief, being the treaty's official, or chief (heh) if you will, representative, should be the one to respond to claims about the treaty as an organization and these responses are for everyone's ears as the treaty's business is everyone's business because the treaty affects everyone.

private messages

It isn't a thing for private messages, this is a matter of public diplomacy or in this case a lack thereof.

-Vision quest complete
Faithfully yours, Mao "Puppy blood is delicious" Ze ****.

[colesie]

You do realize his argument here is "The Chief shouldn't post" then

That is not his argument

What was it then? That the Chief doesn't bother with him so he wins? Please JC if you are going to go with "This is a thread about the treaty and everything that goes along with it. His arguments are in the proper place." Show me what his original "argument" is and how its in its proper place. If he doesn't want the Chief to post or JUST wants the Chief to reply to all responses I would say that's more a personal PM thing. Nothing to do with the treaty.

His arguments are over here Mister Brave sir.

[Gallient]

What was it then? That the Chief doesn't bother with him so he wins? Please JC if you are going to go with "This is a thread about the treaty and everything that goes along with it. His arguments are in the proper place." Show me what his original "argument" is and how its in its proper place. If he doesn't want the Chief to post or JUST wants the Chief to reply to all responses I would say that's more a personal PM thing. Nothing to do with the treaty.

So his arguments are in fact NOT in the treaty thread. Thank you.