MM Tribe Treaty

Forum for In-Game politics, relations and matters of justice.

Re: MM Tribe Treaty

Postby colesie » Fri Apr 19, 2013 6:59 am

kulbek wrote:
jwhitehorn wrote:Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe

jwhitehorn, you troll?

Your answer is very clear. You have a new enemy appeared.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKUOB8MN4Kc
Beep Boop Bop
My builds (Under Occupation)
Image
Have you given haven a try? ◕‿◕
User avatar
colesie
 
Posts: 4753
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 6:20 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: MM Tribe Treaty

Postby jwhitehorn » Fri Apr 19, 2013 7:23 am

kulbek wrote:[
jwhitehorn, you troll?

Your answer is very clear. You have a new enemy appeared.



Image

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe
Admin for Salem Wiki • Make suggestions or complaints in the Wiki Suggestion thread
User avatar
jwhitehorn
 
Posts: 5307
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: MM Tribe Treaty

Postby RuneNL » Fri Apr 19, 2013 7:23 am

kulbek wrote:
jwhitehorn wrote:Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe

jwhitehorn, you troll?

Your answer is very clear. You have a new enemy appeared.


Hes the Tribe bossman and experienced noob murderer.
User avatar
RuneNL
 
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:28 am

Re: MM Tribe Treaty

Postby Gallient » Fri Apr 19, 2013 7:25 am

RuneNL wrote:
kulbek wrote:
jwhitehorn wrote:Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe

jwhitehorn, you troll?

Your answer is very clear. You have a new enemy appeared.


Hes the Tribe bossman and experienced noob murderer.


You think criminals should recieve clemency just because they haven't played as long as other criminals?

Tribe is very fair in that it does not discriminate between delinquents.
User avatar
Gallient
 
Posts: 480
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:32 pm

Re: MM Tribe Treaty

Postby RuneNL » Fri Apr 19, 2013 7:32 am

Gallient wrote:You think criminals should recieve clemency just because they haven't played as long as other criminals?
Tribe is very fair in that it does not discriminate between delinquents.


First of all Gallient, do not think for me, I like to do that myself whether you agree or not that is your problem.

I am just informing our persistent columnist about the Chiefs specialties and position in the tribe.
Yes he specializes in murdering noobs, there is a whole tread dedicated to his specialism.

Tribe is fair and does not discriminate..... Lol.
User avatar
RuneNL
 
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:28 am

Re: MM Tribe Treaty

Postby kulbek » Fri Apr 19, 2013 7:46 am

jwhitehorn wrote:
MM Tribe

Now every good citizen of the forum knows that MM Tribe Treaty of the evil , and the concluded contract is simply a piece of toilet paper which MM Tribe Treaty can break at any time unilaterally.


I m winner
Last edited by kulbek on Sat Apr 20, 2013 5:53 am, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
kulbek
 
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 5:06 pm
Location: Rostov-on-Don, USSR

Re: MM Tribe Treaty

Postby Gallient » Fri Apr 19, 2013 7:46 am

RuneNL wrote:
Gallient wrote:You think criminals should recieve clemency just because they haven't played as long as other criminals?
Tribe is very fair in that it does not discriminate between delinquents.


First of all Gallient, do not think for me, I like to do that myself whether you agree or not that is your problem.

I am just informing our persistent columnist about the Chiefs specialties and position in the tribe.
Yes he specializes in murdering noobs, there is a whole tread dedicated to his specialism.

Tribe is fair and does not discriminate..... Lol.

I apologize if I misinterpreted your point. You label noobs as if they are separate from non-treaty payers when Tribe does not make that distinction?
User avatar
Gallient
 
Posts: 480
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:32 pm

Re: MM Tribe Treaty

Postby RuneNL » Fri Apr 19, 2013 7:49 am

Gallient wrote:You label noobs as if they are separate from non-treaty payers when Tribe does not make that distinction?


No, I am simply not included in your roleplay.

I am talking about new players that are unaware of the the dominance of the Tribe on the Plymouth server.

I do not care for your roleplay reasons or expressions.
User avatar
RuneNL
 
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:28 am

Re: MM Tribe Treaty

Postby jwhitehorn » Fri Apr 19, 2013 7:55 am

kulbek wrote: Now every good citizen of the forum knows that MM Tribe Treaty of the evil , and the concluded contract is simply a piece of toilet paper which MM Tribe Treaty can break at any time unilaterally.


You were not a Treaty Payer.

But since you have chosen Toilet Paper for your metaphor perhaps this will help you understand.

Image

Chief PeePooKaKa
MM Tribe
Admin for Salem Wiki • Make suggestions or complaints in the Wiki Suggestion thread
User avatar
jwhitehorn
 
Posts: 5307
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: MM Tribe Treaty

Postby Gallient » Fri Apr 19, 2013 7:55 am

RuneNL wrote:
Gallient wrote:You label noobs as if they are separate from non-treaty payers when Tribe does not make that distinction?


No, I am simply not included in your roleplay.

I am talking about new players that are unaware of the the dominance of the Tribe on the Plymouth server.

I do not care for your roleplay reasons or expressions.


So if you do not care why do you take the time to explicitly try to establish some sort of distinction that Tribe does not make? The Tribe considers every individual just as capable as the next, and thus every non-treaty payer just as capable in participating in criminal behavior. You attribute new player kills as being a goal of the tribe, when the tribe only considers non-treaty payer kills as a goal. The tribe chooses to treat every single individual equally, and it is a disservice to simply narrow-mindedly section off one portion from another.
User avatar
Gallient
 
Posts: 480
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:32 pm

PreviousNext

Return to House of Burgesses

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests