FearTheAmish wrote:So.... per your definition the American colonies (not just USA but Mexico and most South American nations) are were all terrorists? Gahandi a Terrorist? Isreali Zionist movement Terrorists? i think that word does not mean what you think it does.
No, a colony rebelling against the established government is a rebellion, not terrorism. Now, if the rebels used terrorizing tactics like burning the homes of civilians who supported the established government in an attempt to change the minds of those civilians, those would be acts of terrorism.
Look it up in the dictionary if you don't believe me, but anyone targeting treaty payers with the intent of 'convincing' them to stop paying the treaty and turn against the tribe will have to do it with the knowledge that they are terrorists.
FearTheAmish wrote:Also i think your a bit bias in your opinion you suck the MM ***** harder then Charles M from what i have read. Honestly if i was on Plymouth and against MM you two would be target number 1.
I pay the treaty, *******, who would you expect me to support? If the tribe ever betrayed the treaty, killed treaty payers or some such, you can believe I would change my mind. This isn't blind obedience here, the day the tribe betrays me when I've been loyal, is the day I stop being loyal. Hasn't happened though, hopefully never will.